We see the theoretical underpinning of finding the derivative of an inverse function at a point.

There is one catch to all the explanations given above where we computed derivatives of inverse functions. To write something like

\[ \frac {d}{dx}(e^y)=e^y\cdot y' \]

we need to know that the function \(y\) has a derivative. The Inverse Function Theorem guarantees this.

It is worth giving one more piece of evidence for the formula above, this time based on increments in function, \(\Delta f\), and increments in variable, \(\Delta x\). Consider this plot of a function \(f\) and its inverse:

Since the graph of the inverse of a function is the reflection of the graph of the function over the line \(y=x\), we see that the increments are “switched” when reflected. Hence we see that

\[ \dfrac {\Delta f^{-1}}{\Delta {x}} = \dfrac {\Delta x}{\Delta f}=\dfrac {1}{\dfrac {\Delta f}{\Delta x}}. \]

Taking the limit as \(\Delta x\) goes to \(0\), we can obtain the expression for the derivative of \(f^{-1}\).

\[ \dfrac {d f^{-1}}{d{x}} = \dfrac {1}{\dfrac {d f}{d x}} \]

The inverse function theorem gives us a recipe for computing the derivatives of inverses of functions at points.

If one example is good, two are better:

Finally, let’s see an example where the theorem does not apply.

2025-01-06 19:50:32