You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
We explore more difficult problems involving substitution.
We begin by restating the substitution formula.
Integral Substitution Formula If is differentiable on the interval and is
differentiable on the interval , and if they have continuous derivatives, then
We will work out a few more examples.
Compute:
Let computing , we find and solving for we find Now
The next example requires a new technique.
Compute:
Here it is not apparent that the chain rule is involved. However,
if it was involved, perhaps a good guess for would be and then
Now we consider the integral we are trying to compute
and we substitute using our work above. Write with me
However, we cannot continue until each is replaced. We know that
so now we may replace At this point, we are close to being done. Write
Now recall that . Hence our final answer is
Sometimes it is not obvious how a fraction could have been obtained using the chain
rule. A common trick though is to substitute for the denominator of a fraction. Like
all tricks, this technique does not always work. Regardless the next two examples
present how this technique can be used.
Compute:
We substitute and we immediately see that
But this cancels perfectly with the numerator! So we have that
Notice that when . So in a very contrived way, we have just proved
Notice the variable in this next example.
Compute:
We want to substitute for . But the variable “” has already been
used…OH NO! Never fear! We can substitute with whatever variable that
we want. In particular, let us use “” for this problem. So we let and then
Thus
Recall: So, we can call a variable by any other name and “it would smell as
sweet”.
Compute:
We begin by writing
We then make the substitution and so
Then
But this is the same problem as Example key example! And so we know that
We have just proved
Note that in Example example tan, we could have instead made the substitution This would
have gotten us to the answer quicker and without using Example key example. You are
encouraged to work this out on your own right now!
We end this section with two more difficult examples.
Compute:
Maybe the biggest key to solving this problem is to recall that So we
can rewrite the problem Now, if we make the substitution , we have that
and
But now we are back to Example key example, and so we know that
Again, in the previous example we could have instead made the substitution and
avoided using Example key example. In general, any time that you make two successive
substitutions in a problem, you could have instead just made one substitution. This
one substitution is the composition of the two original substitutions. But
sometimes it may not be obvious to make one clever substitution, and so two
substitutions makes more sense. The next example helps to demonstrate
this.
Compute:
While it is not obvious at all, let us try the substitution Then
and so
From here we now make the second (and more obvious) substitution Then , and
So