We explore functions that “shoot to infinity” near certain points.
Consider the function
While the \(\lim _{x\to -1} f(x)\) does not exist, something can still be said.
If \(|f(x)|\) grows arbitrarily large as \(x\) approaches \(a\) and \(f(x)\) is negative near \(a\), we write
On the other hand, consider the function
While the two sides of the limit as \(x\) approaches \(1\) do not agree, we can still consider the one-sided limits. We see \(\lim _{x\to 1^+} f(x) = \infty \) and \(\lim _{x\to 1^-} f(x) = -\infty \).
- \(\lim _{x\to a} f(x) = \pm \infty \),
- \(\lim _{x\to a^+} f(x) = \pm \infty \),
- \(\lim _{x\to a^-} f(x) = \pm \infty \),
then the line \(x=a\) is a vertical asymptote of \(f\).
Something to notice from the upcoming examples: To find vertical asymptotes, start with discontinuities. If a function is continuous at a point, the limit will exist. There cannot be a vertical asymptote at such a point. To identify the potential vertical asymptotes, find the discontinuities and points that are not in the domain that are approachable from inside the domain (like endpoints).
Start by factoring both the numerator and the denominator:
Now write
Consider the one-sided limits separately.
When \(x\to 3^+\), the quantity \((x-3)\) is positive (because \(x>3\)) and approaches \(0\) and the numerator is negative. This is a \(\relax \boldsymbol {\tfrac {\#}{0}}\)form which is negative for all \(x\) sufficiently close to, but greater than, \(3\). Therefore, \(\displaystyle \lim _{x\to 3^+} f(x) = -\infty \). (Note: Computing this one-sided limit is enough to justify that \(x=3\) is a vertical asymptote of the function \(f\). We will proceed to calculate the other one-sided limit to see if anything can be said about the two-sided limit.)
When \(x\to 3^-\), the quantity \((x-3)\) is negative (because \(x<3\)) and approaches \(0\) and the numerator is negative. This is a \(\relax \boldsymbol {\tfrac {\#}{0}}\)form which is positive for all \(x\) sufficiently close to, but less than, \(3\). Therefore, \(\displaystyle \lim _{x\to 3^-} f(x) = \infty \). Since the two one-sided limits did not agree, \(\displaystyle \lim _{x\to 3}f(x)\) does not exist.
Notice that in this previous example, there was a vertical asymptote at \(x=3\), even though the number \(3\) was not in the domain of the function \(f\). Vertical asymptotes are defined in terms of limits. The important point is that we can approach the number \(3\) from within the domain of \(f\).
The numerator \(x^2\sin (x)\) and the denominator \(e^{2x}x(x-4)\) are each continuous on \((-\infty , \infty )\). That means the only possibilities to check for vertical asymptotes are those numbers making the denominator zero.
Using limits, we must investigate what happens with \(g(x)\) when \(x\to 0\) and \(x\to 4\), since \(0\) and \(4\) are the only zeroes of the denominator (since \(e^{2x}\) is never zero). We write
Since \(\displaystyle \lim _{x\to 0}g(x)=0\), there is no vertical asymptote at \(x=0\).
We turn our attention to the limit as \(x\) approaches \(4\). Let us start with the limit from the right.
For the numerator, notice that \(\pi < 4 < \dfrac {3\pi }{2}\). That means \(\sin (4)\) is the sine value of something in Quadrant III, making it negative. That \(x\) is near \(4\) makes the \(x\) factor in the numerator positive. The numerator is negative for all \(x\) sufficiently close to, but greater than, \(4\).
For the denominator, \(e^{2x}\) is always positive. Since \(x>4\), the factor \(x-4\) is also positive. The denominator is positive for all relevant values of \(x\).
That makes the fraction \(\dfrac {x\sin (x)}{e^{2x}(x-4)}\) negative valued for all \(x\) sufficiently close to, but greater than, \(4\). This means \(\displaystyle \lim _{x\to 4^+} g(x) = -\infty \).
There is a vertical asymptote at \(x=4\). There are no others, since the only other discontinuity is at \(0\) but \(\displaystyle \lim _{x\to 0}g(x)=0\).
For our final example, we work with a function whose vertical asymptote is NOT where the denominator is zero.
There is only one \(x\)-value where \(f\) could have a vertical asymptote: at \(x=0\). It is not in the domain of \(f\), but is approachable from within the domain. Where the denominator is zero, \(x=-5\) is NOT a possibility because \(-5\) cannot be approached from within \((0,\infty )\) due to the gap in the number line between \(-5\) and \(0\).
Since we can only approach \(0\) from the right (while staying in the domain of \(f\)), we should examine the right-hand limit:
For the numerator we have \(\lim _{x\to 0^+} \ln (x) = -\infty \), while for the denominator we have \(\lim _{x\to 0^+} (x+5) = 5\). This means \(\lim _{x\to 0^+} f(x) = -\infty \).
There is a vertical asymptote at \(x=0\). There are no others because \(f\) is continuous on its domain \((0,\infty )\).