You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
We use a method called “linear approximation” to estimate the value of a
(complicated) function at a given point.
Given a function, a linear approximation is a fancy phrase for something you already
know:
The line tangent to the graph of a function at a point is
very close to the graph of the function near that point.
This tangent line is the graph of a linear function, called the linear approximation.
Let be a function that is differentiable on some interval I that contains the point .
The graph of a function and the line tangent to the curve
at the point where are given in the figure below. Find the equation of the tangent
line.
First, find the expression for , the slope of the tangent line to the curve at the point .
Select the correct choice.
We don’t have enough information to determine the slope.
Since we know that the point lies on the tangent line, we can write an equation of
the tangent line.
Now, we define a function, , by . This function is linear and its graph is the line
tangent to the curve at the point where . This function deserves a special
name.
If is a function differentiable at , then a linear approximation to the function at
is given by
Note that the graph of is just the tangent line to the graph of at .
A linear approximation of is a “good” approximation as long as is “not too far”
from . If one “zooms in” on the graph of sufficiently, then the graphs of and are
nearly indistinguishable.
As a first example, we will see how linear approximations allow us to approximate
“difficult” computations.
Let be a function defined by Approximate , using , a linear approximation to the
function at .
To start, write
Now we evaluate . This was easy to compute, since is a linear function! Using a
calculator we can see that and that . Therefore, is not only easy to evaluate, but
also gives us a close approximation of .
What would happen if we chose instead?
Then we would use , the linear approximation to the function at . In that case, . The
graph of , together with the graphs of and is given in the figure below.
From the picture we can see that
.
So, our choice, , was better!
With modern calculators and computing software, it may not appear necessary to
use linear approximations. In fact they are quite useful. In cases requiring an
explicit numerical approximation, they allow us to get a quick rough estimate
which can be used as a “reality check” on a more complex calculation. In
some complex calculations involving functions, the linear approximation
makes an otherwise intractable calculation possible, without serious loss of
accuracy.
Use a linear approximation of at to approximate .
To start, write so our linear
approximation is
Hence, a linear approximation for at is , and so . Comparing this to , we see that
the approximation is quite good. For this reason, it is common to approximate with
its linear approximation when is near zero.
Differentials
The graph of a function and the graph of , the linear approximation of at , are
shown in the figure below. Also, two quantities, and , and a point are marked
in the figure. Look carefully at the figure when answering the questions
below.
Select all the correct expressions for the quantity .
You can see that .
Select all the correct expressions for the quantity .
You can see that .
Recall: .
Based on the figure and the expression for , select all the correct expressions for .
Recall: .
So, we can write and call it a differential of at . Notice that we can define a
differential at any point of the domain of , provided that exists. We will do that in
our next definition.
Let be a differentiable function, let be a point in the domain of ,
and let be some quantity, called a differential of . We define , a differential of , at a
point by
Geometrically, differentials can be interpreted via the diagram below.
Note, it is now the case (by definition!) that
We should not be surprised, since the slope of the tangent line in the figure is , and
this slope is also given by .
Essentially, differentials allow us to solve the problems presented in the previous
examples from a slightly different point of view. Recall, when is near but not
equal zero, Hence, We can replace a quantity with a quantity to write
Adding to both sides we see or, equivalently There are contexts where the language
of differentials is common. Here is the basic strategy:
We will repeat our previous examples using differentials.
Use differentials to approximate .
Set . We want to know . Since , we set . Setting ,
we have
Here we see a plot of with the differentials above marked:
Now we must compute :
Hence .
Use differentials to approximate .
Set . We want to know . Since , we will set and .
Write with me
Here we see a plot of with the differentials above marked:
Now we must compute :
Hence .
The upshot is that linear approximations and differentials are simply two slightly
different ways of doing the exact same thing.
Error approximation
Differentials also help us estimate error in real life settings.
A glass containing water is shown in the figure below.
Let denote the height of water (measured in centimeters). The volume of the water
in the glass (in milliliters), as a function of , is given by
There is a mark indicating when the glass is filled to ml at cm from the base of the
glass. If the glass is filled within millimeters of the mark, what are the bounds on the
volume?
We want to know what a small change in the height, , does to the volume .
These small changes can be modeled by the differentials and . Since and
we use the fact that with to see Hence the volume will vary by roughly
milliliters.
New and old friends
You might be wondering, given a plot ,
What’s the difference between and ? What about and ?
Regardless, it is now a pressing question. Here’s the deal: is the average rate of
change of with respect to . On the other hand: is the instantaneous rate of
change of with respect to . Essentially, and are the same type of thing, they
are (usually small) changes in . However, and are very different things.
; it is the change in associated to .
, it is the change in associated to . Note: .
So, the change
Suppose . If we are at the point and , what is ? What is ?
Differentials can be confusing at first. However, when you master them, you will
have a powerful tool at your disposal.