Most problems have hints if you need to be led through the problem. For some problems, if you get the answer wrong, there is feedback at least giving you the setup.

Problems

Let be the six outer faces of the box (i.e. , , ), oriented with outward normals. Let . Then
The surface isis not closed. The components of the vector field have continuous partials everywhere (they are polynomials), so we can use the Divergence Theorem. The surface is correctlyincorrectly oriented. Now apply the Divergence Theorem.
Switch the order of integration on the integral . Switching the order gives the integral
If and is the curve given by for , then
This is a vector line integral, so we first check whether the vector field is conservative. Notice so is conservative. We can actually find the potential function here, and it is (give the one with ) The endpoints of are and Plugging these into and subtracting gives
If and are unit vectors and , then the angle between and is equal to (give your answer between and ).
If and is the triangle in the first octant connecting , , and , oriented clockwise when viewed from above, then .
Use Stokes’ Theorem.
We first check whether is conservative. Note that so is not conservative. Doing this line integral directly would involve parametrizing three different line segments, so let us not do that. However, we note that isis not closed, so we can use Stokes’ theorem. All we need to do is pick a surface with as its boundary, and then compute instead. One surface we can choose is the portion of the plane through those three points (i.e. filling in the triangle with a plane). This plane has equation Flux integrals depend on orientation, so we decide that now. For Stokes’ theorem to work, we need to pick upwarddownward normals for .

Now we compute the flux integral. We parametrize as with the domain being the triangle in the -plane with vertices , , and . Then which is the wrong normal, so we negate it and use instead. The flux is then
Let be the region and above by . Consider the triple integral
  • In Cartesian coordinates, the bounds on the iterated integral would be
    To get the intersection of the paraboloid with the sphere , take and plug this into the sphere equation to get , which gives . The intersection is therefore the circle in the plane .
  • In cylindrical coordinates, the setup for the integral would be
  • Evaluating in either coordinate system gives an answer of .

Let be the solid given by where . Evaluate in both cylindrical and spherical coordinates. The answer in either case is .
The surface area of the surface given by where and , is equal to .
The surface area is . In this case, this just amounts to calculating where is the domain for and . In this case, and the integral becomes We cannot integrate in this order, so switch the order of integration:
Let be the portion of with , oriented with outward normals, and let . Then
Notice that , so we cannot use Stokes’ Theorem/change the surface. The surface is not closed, but we can close it and use Divergence Theorem. Let be the disc in the plane , so that and together form a closed surface. We will orient upward (arbitrary choice). For Divergence Theorem, is correctlyincorrectly oriented, and is correctlyincorrectly oriented. Therefore, the setup is where is the enclosed solid region.
  • For the triple integral, it is most nicely computed in Cartesiancylindricalspherical coordinates, and the triple integral setup in cylindrical would be This evaluates to .
  • For the flux integral, we can parametrize the surface as for . Then which is the correctincorrect normal. Therefore, the flux of through becomes

Putting everything together, we get an answer of .

Let and let be the portion of with , oriented with outward normals. Then
There are two ways to do this: surface independence/divergence theorem (with closing) or direct Stokes’ Theorem. The latter would say where is the boundary of . The boundary is in the plane , oriented clockwisecounterclockwise when viewed from above. Parametrize the circle as for , which is oriented correctlyincorrectly . The line integral of over is therefore You should try using surface independence/divergence theorem (with closing) as well.
Let be the plane through the point which is perpendicular to the line given by An equation for is (give the answer in the form ):
A normal vector for the plane is the direction vector for the line, which is . The answer is .
If and is the portion of where , oriented with outward normals, then
Note that is not closed, but we can close it and try to use Divergence Theorem. Note that . We can close it by adding which will be the disc in the plane . We will orient downward (arbitrary choice). For Divergence Thoerem, the surface is correctlyincorrectly oriented and is correctlyincorrectly oriented. Therefore, where is the enclosed solid.
  • The triple integral is
  • The flux through : Parametrize the disc as for . Then which is the correctincorrect normal, so we switch the sign on the vector to get a normal of . Using this we get a flux of .

Therefore, the answer is .

If is the disc , then .
If , evaluate , where is the curve , in three different ways. No matter which way you do it, you get an answer of .
Let be the solid region where , and let be the outer facing of the solid, oriented with outward normals (i.e. is the closed surface consisting of the hemisphere and the disc to close the hemisphere). If , then
Since is closed, we can use Divergence Theorem. The surface is correctly oriented. The divergence of is . We can set the triple integral up in spherical. It becomes
Let be the parallelogram with vertices , , , and , oriented clockwise when viewed from above. If then
Notice which tells us that isis not conservative. To do this integral directly would involve four different line segments, so we would like to avoid that. For Stokes’ Theorem, The curl isn’t particularly nice, but maybe something nice will happen when we take the flux. At this point, it seems like the only option.

The curve lies on a plane, and the equation of the plane is . We will let this be our surface . We can parametrize the surface as and the domain is a rectangle given by With the given orientation of , the surface should be oriented with normals pointing in the positivenegative -direction. Now we compute which is the correctincorrect normal vector, so we can negate it when computing the flux. The flux of the curl is therefore
If and is the curve given by for , then .
Doing this integral directly is the best way to go since is not conservative and is not closed (and this is a 3D vector field, not 2D where you can close and use Green’s Theorem).
Let be the sphere , oriented with outward normals, and let . The integral
If and is the portion of where , oriented with outward normals, then .
This is either a Divergence Theorem after closing the surface or just straight changing the surface problem, since . Let be the disc in the plane , oriented downward. Then the flux of through is the same as the flux through . Calculate the flux through .
If , then
This is an implicit differentiation problem. Let . Near , becomes a function of and , so the equation reads . Taking the partial of both sides with respect to and using the chain rule on the left side gives so Plugging in the point gives an answer of .
The triple integral written as a triple integral in spherical coordinates would be (write “rho” for , for , and “theta” for ):
If is the portion of in the first octant, then .
This is a scalar surface integral. Parametrize as with domain the filled-in triangle in the -plane with vertices , and , call this Then which has magnitude . The surface integral is therefore Now evaluate.
The double integral
Switch the order of integration.
The surface area of the part of below is .
Let be the portion of below . We need to calculate We need to parametrize . We can parametrize as with domain . The magnitude The surface integral is therefore We can go to polar from here:
If and is the sphere , oriented with outward normals, then
Use the Divergence Theorem.
Let . Let be the surface which is the portion of above the -plane, oriented with inward normals. Then
You can either use Stokes’ Theorem or surface independence. Using the former, we can say where is the boundary of (with positive boundary orientation). In this case, the boundary is the circle in the plane , oriented clockwisecounterclockwise when viewed from above. We can parametrize the boundary as for . This is going the correctwrong way, so we add a negative. Therefore, the answer is
Let be the portion of above the plane , oriented with downward normals. Let . Then Try to get this answer in two different ways.
Notice that . We can use surface independence to get the flux of this vector field. Let be the disc in the plane , oriented with downward normals. Then Now calculate the flux through .

Alternatively, you can use Stokes’ Theorem.
Let be the region given by . The integral
If is the solid region bounded by , , , and , then the volume of is equal to .
The volume of the solid given by and is equal to .
Let be the solid given by and . The integral setup for in spherical coordinates is (input “rho” for , “p” for ):
The answer is
Let be the solid region above and below . The triple integral setup for in cylindrical coordinates is
The projection into the -plane of the intersection of the paraboloid and the plane is a circle of radius and center , which has polar equation . The setup should be
The tangent plane to the surface at the point has equation (give in the form ):
A normal vector for the plane is , where . The answer is
Let be the line of intersection between the planes and .
  • The point isis not on the line .
  • The vector isis not parallel to the line .

The area of the triangle with vertices , , and is equal to .
The area is equal to, for example, The vectors which have a cross product of This has magnitude , giving an area of .
Let be the surface given implicitly by . The tangent plane to at the point has equation (give the answer in the form ):
Let . Then the tangent plane to at the point has a normal vector of . Here, the gradient is so Since we have a point on the plane, we can write down the equation as Now rearrange to get the equation of the plane in form.
Let and be the point . The instantaneous rate of change of the function at in the direction of is equal to .
Is increasing or decreasing at in the direction of ?
Increasing Decreasing
If , then
This is an implicit differentiation problem. Let . Near , becomes a function of and , so the equation reads . Taking the partial of both sides with respect to and using the chain rule on the left side gives so Plugging in the point gives an answer of .
Suppose and , and let . Then
This is a chain rule problem. We get Notice Finally, notice that the point corresponds to an value of (this is ). Plugging all into the above expression gives an answer of .
Let be the region under the plane , above the paraboloid , and inside the cylinder . The volume of is equal to .
Let be the portion of the cylinder with , oriented with outward normals. If , then
We can close this and use Divergence Theorem, but we have to close it with two different lids: in the plane and in the plane . Let be the disc in the plane , and be the disc in the plane , both oriented upward. Then we can use Divergence Theorem on combined surface with and , noting that is correctlyincorrectly oriented, is correctlyincorrectly oriented, and is correctlyincorrectly oriented. Therefore The triple integral should give an answer of , the flux through is and the flux through is . Together, this gives an answer of .