You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
[?]
Objectives:
1.
Know the statement of Green’s Theorem.
2.
Understand the required orientation of the curve in the statement
of Green’s Theorem.
3.
Be able to use any technique to compute a line integral.
Recap Video
First, take a look at this recap video going over Green’s theorem.
Examples
The following video shows an example using Green’s theorem.
Let be the line
segment from to followed by the counterclockwise portion of from to ,
evaluate
Note that the integrand for the double integral before the answer should be ,
not . The answer might change once this is changed.
This next video illustrates how to close the curve and then use Green’s
theorem.
If is the curve from to , and , evaluate .
Problems
Let and let be the triangle with vertices , , and , oriented counterclockwise.
Evaluate .
We will eventually use Green’s Theorem, but it will be good to see
a possible thought process for line integrals. Notice
so
conservative. Therefore, we cannot use FTLI or its consequences.
Instead, we will see if we can use Green’s theorem. We have three things to
check:
The curve
closed.
The components of
have continuous partials on the closed region enclosed by .
The curve
positively oriented.
Since all three conditions are satisfied, we can use Green’s theorem. If is the
closed region enclosed by , Green’s theorem says
This integral is equal to:
Therefore, the answer is: .
Compute the line integral , where is the unit circle, oriented clockwise.
Let .
Notice
so
conservative. Therefore, we cannot use FTLI or its consequences.
Instead, we will see if we can use Green’s theorem. We have three things to
check:
The curve
closed.
The components of
have continuous partials on the closed region enclosed by .
The curve
positively oriented.
We can fix the third condition by adding a negative in the statement of
Green’s theorem to correct the orientation. With this, Green’s theorem
says
To set this integral up, we can go to polar coordinates. In polar, we
get
This integral evaluates to .
Let be the boundary of the unit square , , oriented counterclockwise.
Then
First, we will check whether the vector field is conservative. The components
of have continuous partials everywhere, so the first condition is satisfied. The
mixed partials
so
conservative. So we cannot use the FTLI.
Next, we can try Green’s Theorem. There are three things to check:
Closed curve:
closed.
Orientation:
properly oriented.
Vector Field:
have continuous partials in the region enclosed by .
Therefore, we can use Green’s Theorem, which says:
Now the only decision to make is whether to do the double integral in
Cartesian or polar. Which would be better in this case?
Therefore,
Let be the line segment from to followed by the portion of from to . If ,
then
First, we will check whether the vector field is conservative. The components
of have continuous partials everywhere, so the first condition is satisfied. The
mixed partials
so
conservative. So we cannot use the FTLI.
Next, we can try Green’s Theorem. There are three things to check:
Closed curve:
closed.
Orientation:
properly oriented.
Vector Field:
have continuous partials in the region enclosed by .
Therefore, we can use Green’s Theorem after adding a
negative sign to fix the orientation problem. We then get
Now the only decision to make is whether to do the double integral in
Cartesian or polar. Which would be better in this case?
Therefore,
Let , and is the portion of from to , evaluate .
Since
we know that
conservative. Since isn’t closed, we cannot use Green’s theorem (yet).
However, to do this integral directly would be annnoying because of the term
in the -component (try parametrizing and doing this integral directly).
So we are left with trying to use Green’s theorem. However, since isn’t closed,
we must close it ourselves. We can do this by adding in, for example,
the curve which is the line segment from to . Then the combined
curve consisting of and is closed. We still have to check the other two
conditions:
The components of
have continuous partials on the closed region enclosed by and
.
The curve
positively oriented and the curve
positively oriented.
So we will have to account for the orientation in the statement of Green’s
theorem. The theorem gives
where is the region enclosed by and . (Notice the sign in the second
integral to fix the orientation.) We now have two integrals to compute:
To compute , we can set up the iterated integrals. In the order , it
becomes
To compute , we can parametrize as for . Then
and
Therefore,
Putting all this together, we get
Let , and is the line segment from to , followed by the line segment from to
, followed again by the line segment from to , then
First, we will check whether the vector field is conservative. The components
of have continuous partials everywhere, so the first condition is satisfied. The
mixed partials
so
conservative. So we cannot use the FTLI.
Next, we can try Green’s Theorem. There are three things to check. The first
is whether is closed. Notice
closed, so we cannot use Green’s Theorem yet. The last alternative would be
to do the integral directly, but this would mean doing three separate integrals,
which we don’t want to do. So we can close the curve ourselves and use
Green’s Theorem.
Let be the line segment from to , so that and together make a closed curve.
For Green’s Theorem, is
oriented, and is
oriented. We will fix the latter by adding a negative. Lastly, the components
of have continuous partials on the enclosed region . Therefore,
We now have two pieces to compute:
The double integral. The shortcut would be to notice that
The other way would be to set up the double integral, noting Cartesian
is easier here. Which order would be the easiest to compute the double
integral in?
The setup is:
The line integral over : Parametrize as
for . Then
Therefore,
Putting everything together, we get the answer for the line integral over to
be .
Start typing the name of a mathematical function to automatically insert it.
(For example, "sqrt" for root, "mat" for matrix, or "defi" for definite integral.)
Controls
Press...
...to do
left/right arrows
Move cursor
shift+left/right arrows
Select region
ctrl+a
Select all
ctrl+x/c/v
Cut/copy/paste
ctrl+z/y
Undo/redo
ctrl+left/right
Add entry to list or column to matrix
shift+ctrl+left/right
Add copy of current entry/column to to list/matrix
ctrl+up/down
Add row to matrix
shift+ctrl+up/down
Add copy of current row to matrix
ctrl+backspace
Delete current entry in list or column in matrix
ctrl+shift+backspace
Delete current row in matrix
×
Start typing the name of a mathematical function to automatically insert it.
(For example, "sqrt" for root, "mat" for matrix, or "defi" for definite integral.)