Now that we have calculated both the perimeter of shapes as well as their areas, what can we say about the relationship between the two ideas? Let’s investigate with a few examples.

We have seen already with moving and additivity that we can make many different shapes with the same area by moving around pieces of the area. When we move around this area, the perimeter can change significantly.

If we start with a square whose area is square centimeters and rearrange its area, what different perimeters can we make?

First, what if we keep the square as a square? Its side lengths would each be centimeters.

Since each side of the square measures cm and there are four equal sides, the total perimeter here is centimeters.

What if we rearrange the square centimeters of area into a rectangle which is cm long and cm wide?

The area is still square centimeters, but now the perimeter is centimeters.

What if we rearrange the area so that we have a rectangle which is cm long and cm wide? We still have square centimeters of area, but now the perimeter is centimeters.

What if we rearrange the area so that we have a rectangle which is cm long and cm wide? We still have square centimeters of area, but now the perimeter is centimeters.

What if we rearrange the area into an -shape which is cm on the bottom, cm on the top, cm on the long side, and cm on the shorter side (plus the other two sides making up the L)?

The area is still square centimeters, but now the perimeter is centimeters.
So, we can see from our explorations that moving area around doesn’t preserve the perimeter. We get different answers for different perimeters.

What about the opposite of moving and additivity? What if we keep the perimeter the same, and look at different areas that can be made?

Let’s start by investigating rectangles.

If we keep a fixed perimeter of cm and make different rectangles, what values for area do we get?

Let’s start by making a rectangle with side lengths of cm and cm.

What is its area? square centimeters

Now let’s make a rectangle with side lengths of cm and cm.

What is its area? square centimeters

Now let’s make a rectangle with side lengths of cm and cm.

What is its area? square centimeters

Finally, let’s make a square with side lengths of cm.

What is its area? square centimeters
As our rectangle gets closer and closer to a square, the area is getting larger and larger. If we kept going with our pattern (and made the rectangle taller than it is wide) we would see the area start to go back down again as we made the rectangle more and more tall and skinny. From this work, let’s observe the following fact. We can also make an observation about the smallest area possible. When we stretched out our rectangle to make it more skinny, we got a smaller area. If we had a certain area, like square centimeters, and we wanted a smaller area, like square centimeters, we would just need to stretch out our rectangle a bit more. However, if we tried to make a rectangle with an area of square centimeters, we wouldn’t have a rectangle at all!

What about if we are allowed to make shapes other than rectangles? Here, if you missed the in-class activity, I encourage you to grab a piece of string, tie it into a loop, and investigate some possible areas. Come back when you’ve made several different shapes and recorded their areas. If you did this activity in class, just go ahead and enter a few of your answers from class below.

What are three different areas that can be made with a string whose perimeter is approximately inches?

square inches

square inches

square inches

Let’s see if we can observe a general rule like we did with rectangles.

As we push the perimeter outward, more and more towards being a circle, we get more and more area. It seems like we’ve observed the following result. A full proof of this fact would take some calculus, so we’ll stick with what we’ve observed here. If we ask you to justify why this theorem is true, it’s enough to show some examples and explain what we observed. Notice that we can say even slightly more: by pushing in the sides of the figure, we can make any area we like. If we need a little less area, we can push the perimeter a little more towards the center of the figure, and if we need a little more area, we can push the perimeter more outwards again (until it’s fully pushed out and forms a circle). So, if we are given a particular perimeter, we can’t say what the area is exactly, but we can give limits on what the area could be.

Fun fact: we can make similar claims for the range of perimeters possible when we keep area fixed, but we’ll leave that as an option for an exercise later!

Recognizing the difference between perimeter and area is an important skill for kids. Exploring the relationships between them helps us to think about how and why they are different ideas!

Pause and think: in your own words, how are perimeter and area different? How are they related?
Enter your thoughts here!
2025-06-17 01:25:50