You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?

Updated Version Available

There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?

Mathematical Expression Editor

Chat

We can also use the procedure of “Slice, Approximate, Integrate” to set up integrals
to compute volumes.

Accumulation of cross-sections

We have seen how to compute certain areas by using integration. The same
technique used to find those areas can be applied to find volumes as well! In
this section, we consider volumes whose cross-sections taken through their
bases are common shapes from geometry. In fact, we can think of these
cross-sections as being “slabs” that we layer either next to each other or
over each other to obtain the solid in question. We begin with a motivating
example.

The base of a solid is the region in the -plane bounded by and the -axis. Slices
through the solid that are perpendicular to the -axis are squares.

We can apply the procedure of “Slice, Approximate, Integrate” to set up an integral
that computes the volume of the solid.

Step 1: Slice
Since the cross-sections are perpendicular to the -axis, this means: the slices are
horizontal.the slices are vertical.

The slices on the actual three-dimensional solid are shown as well:

Recall that these slices on the base are the side of a square cross-section. The
other side extends above the -plane. Thus, the actual slices on the solid look
like:

Step 2: Approximate
As usual, we approximate the base of each slice by a rectangle. For the sake of
example, we use righthand endpoints and rectangles of uniform width to draw the
picture:

The corresponding approximate slices on the solid are shown below:

The dark slab is a rectangular prism, so its volume is:

Since we are slicing with respect to , we must express the side length in terms of .
Thus, we describe the curves in the image as functions of .

Note that the parabola must be described using functions of . In fact, solving for ,
we obtain: and .

Note that the parabola does not pass the vertical line test, so it must be described
using functions of . This also arises as an algebraic consequence when we solve for
since we must consider the positive and negative square roots. In fact, solving for
gives and .

We update our picture with what we have found so far:

From the image, we see that is a vertical distance.horizontal distance.

Thus, we may find using ..

From our picture, we find and . Thus:

and using , we have that the approximate volume of a single slice at a given -value
is:

Step 3: Integrate
As before, the approximate volume is obtained by adding all of the volumes of all of
the approximate slices together. The exact volume requires simultaneously that the
width of the slices become arbitrarily thin and that the number of slices to be added
becomes arbitrarily large.

As before, the definite integral performs both of these operations simultaneously. In
fact, since , we can write:

and the total approximate volume using slices is:

where is the righthand endpoint of each slice.

Step 3: Integrate
As before, the approximate volume is obtained by adding all of the volumes of all of
the approximate slices together. The exact volume requires simultaneously that the
width of the slices become arbitrarily small while the number of slices to be added
becomes arbitrarily large. Symbolically, we write:

As before, we can write this as a definite integral:

Remark: Since we slice with respect to , we must express the curves in the image as
functions of ; that is, we must write and in terms of . Once we choose a
variable of integration, every quantity (limits of integration, functions in the
integrand) must be written in terms of that variable. This is an important point
that arises when we use a Riemann integral to compute any quantity of
interest.

and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus can now be used to evaluate the definite
integral, which gives a much more efficient way to find the volume (rather than by
calculating the simultaneous limits described above). Evaluating the definite integral,
we find the volume is cubic units.

Volumes of solids with known cross-sections

We can summarize the previous procedure with a simple formula that respects the
geometrical reasoning used to generate the volume of a solid with a known type of
cross-section:

Suppose that cross-sections are taken through a given solid.

If the cross sectional area can be expressed as a function of , then the
volume is given by where is the -position of the leftmost cross-section
and is the -location of the rightmost cross-section.

If the cross sectional area can be expressed as a function of , then the
volume is given by where is the -position of the leftmost cross-section
and is the -location of the rightmost cross-section.

In each case, is the cross-sectional area of a slice of the solid. Note that both the
area and the limits of integration must be expressed in terms of the variable of
integration.

So how do we determine which formula to use? The problem will indicate an
orientation for the slice. Draw the base of the solid in the -plane, and indicate a
prototypical slice on your picture. The orientation of the slice will give you the
variable of integration.

Suppose that slices are taken parallel to the -axis. Then, the slices are the slices
are verticalthe slices are horizontal and we should integrate with respect to .

Suppose that slices are taken perpendicular to the -axis. Then, the slices are the
slices are verticalthe slices are horizontal and we should integrate with respect to .

Let’s see some examples:

The base of a solid is the region in the -plane bounded by , , , and . Cross-sections
through the solid taken parallel to the -axis are semicircles. Find the volume of the
solid.

Since the slices are taken parallel to the -axis. Then, the slices are the slices are
verticalthe slices are horizontal and we should integrate with respect to .

Since we have to integrate with respect to , we should describe the line as a function
of . Solving for , we obtain .

We draw a picture of the base and indicate a typical slice.

Note that the cross-sections are semicircles whose base is in the -plane. Thus, the
quantity labelled in the image is the radius of the semicirclediameter of the
semicircle.

From the image, we see that is a vertical distancehorizontal distance.

Thus, we may find using .

The right curve is and the left curve is . Thus:

Notice that it is completely irrelevant of the quadrant in which the left and right
curves appear; we can always find a horizontal quantity of interest (in this case ), by
taking and using the expressions that describe the relevant curves in terms of
.

After a little algebra, we find that the the radius of the semicircle is and the area of
the semicircle is found using:

Thus, an integral that gives the volume of the solid is

Evaluating this integral (which you should verify by working it out on your own.), we
find that the volume of the solid is cubic units.

Although it has been pointed out before, the following point is important. The
quadrant in which the left and right curves appear does not affect how we find
horizontal distances; we can always find a horizontal distance by taking
.

Sometimes, more than one integral is needed to set up a volume of a solid
with known cross-sections. Drawing a picture helps to identify when this is
necessary.

The base of a solid is the region in the first quadrant of the -plane bounded by and .
Cross-sections taken perpendicular to the -axis are equilateral triangles. Set up, but
do not evaluate, an integral or sum of integrals that would give the volume of the
solid.

Since the slices are taken perpendicular to the -axis. Then, the slices are the slices
are verticalthe slices are horizontal and we should integrate with respect to .

Since we have to integrate with respect to , we should describe the line as a function
of . Solving for , we obtain: .

We draw a picture of the base and indicate a typical slice:

As you can see, the curve used to determine the lefthand coordinate of rectangle changesdoes not change depending on where the slice is drawn. We thus need integrals to find the
volume.

The left curve will change at the -value where the curve intersects the -axis, which
occurs when .

For the second region, we find the upper -value by requiring that the curves and
intersect. This occurs when .

Using the picture above and the fact that since the cross-sections are equilateral
triangles, , we may write down the important information about each region:

Putting this together, we can write down a sum of integrals that gives the
volume:

Final thoughts

To summarize some recurring ideas we have seen we have seen (and will see again),
always draw and label a picture. Interpret the quantities in your picture and write
down the relevant geometric quantities in terms of the variable of integration.

At the risk of being repetitive, let’s summarize some recurring ideas we have seen in
the past few sections and will see again.

Always draw and label a picture. Interpret the quantities in your picture
and write down anything you need in terms of the variable of integration.

To find vertical distances, we always take . To find horizontal distances,
we always take .

When we integrate with respect to , we use vertical slices and when we
use vertical slices, we integrate with respect to . When we integrate with
respect to , we use horizontal slices and when we use horizontal slices, we
integrate with respect to .

Once we choose a variable of integration, everything in the integrand must be
expressed in terms of that variable. This includes both the limits of integration and
any functions that arise in the integrand.

Remember, it takes practice to learn math. Don’t just read through examples; work
them out yourself as you read along. Calculus is a hard subject. Don’t get
discouraged.

“The only way to learn mathematics is to do mathematics.” — Paul
Halmos