The limit is .
We find limits using numerical information.
1 Limit notation
Limits are the backbone of calculus. A limit tells us the end of an infinite process. For example, consider the following infinite sequence of numbers: This infinite sequence of numbers is becoming arbitrarily close to the number 1, so we say the limit of the sequence is 1. In calculus, we will be concerned with limits involving functions. The inputs of the function will undergo an infinite process which will then correspond to an infinite process for the outputs. Our goal will be to determine the limit of the outputs. Suppose that represents a function of the input variable . We denote by an infinite process where the inputs are becoming arbitrarily close to the value without ever reaching it. Then, we denote by the limit of the outputs of the function as approaches . The possibilities for the limit of the outputs of are: a numerical value, , , or that the limit does not exist. If the numerical value of the limit is , then as the input variable approaches the value , the outputs, approach the value , and we would write
If the value of the limit is , then as , the outputs are increasing without bound, and we write
Similarly, if the limit is , that means the outputs are decreasing without bound, and we write
If none of the previous conclusions apply, we say that the limit does not exist, and we write
In addition to writing , we can also write the expression to indicate that is approaching from the left-hand side and to indicate that is approaching from the right-hand side.
The expression can be understood visually using the following diagram:
Note that implies . Similarly, the expression can be understood visually using the following diagram:
Note that implies . We refer to the limits
as one-sided limits, and we refer to
as a two-sided limit. Note that if the associated one-sided limits are not equal, then the two-sided limit does not exist.
We can also let the inputs, , either increase or decrease without bound, denoted by and respectively. These can be represented visually by the following diagrams:
We refer to the limits as limits at infinity.
2 Finding limits numerically
In what follows, functions will be presented using formulas. We will determine the limit of a function by making an appropriate table of values.
Here is the analysis:
If then .
If then .
If then .
If then .
We can summarize this information in a table:
The outputs appear to be approaching the number 11, leading us to conclude that
In this particular example, we could have arrived at the answer by simply plugging the number into the function since .
In general, when plugging in the value that is approaching yields a number, that number is usually the correct answer.
We now turn our attention to examples where the shortcut of “plugging in” does not work.
First, if we plug into the function, we get the fraction , which is called an indeterminate form. This means that the answer can be anything and so a deeper analysis is required.
Since is approaching from the right, we have . We can represent this numerically using the values . To guess the limit, we will plug these values into the function and look for a pattern in the outputs.
Here is the analysis:
If then .
If then .
If then .
If then .
We summarize this information in the table below.
The outputs appear to be approaching the number 1.5, leading us to guess that
In section 1.4, we will learn algebraic techniques to validate this result.
Now determine the limit: .
The numerical evidence suggests that the limit is: .
The next example involves both 1-sided limits and the associated 2-sided limit. Furthermore, the result can be interpreted as the slope of a tangent line to the graph of the exponential function at .
To determine the first limit, we look at the second table where is approaching from the left. The outputs appear to be approaching the number 1, leading us to conclude that To determine the second limit, we look at the first table where is approaching from the right. The outputs again appear to be approaching the number 1, leading us to conclude that Since the one-sided limits are equal, we conclude that the two-sided limit is also equal to 1: Note that the fraction is not defined at since plugging in yields the indeterminate form . Moreover, the fraction represents the slope of the secant line between the points and on the graph of . Thus, the limit represents the slope of the tangent line to the graph of at the point .
The next problem gives the slope of the tangent line to the graph of the function at .
Now use the numerical information to guess the one-sided limits:
Based on the one-sided limits, determine the two-sided limit:
It should be noted that plugging into the function yields the indeterminate form , which is not a final answer.
The next problem gives the slope of the tangent line to the graph natural logarithm function at .
Based on the one-sided limits, determine the two-sided limit:
It should be noted that plugging into the function yields the indeterminate form , which is not a final answer.
Now determine the limit:
Now determine the limit:
The second table suggests the limit
Since the one-sided limits are not equal, the two-sided limit does not exist. we can express this by writing
Fill in the tables below with 5 decimal places of accuracy and use them to find the
following limits: Now determine the limits:
Since the one-sided limits are not equal, the two-sided limit does not exist.
First, we observe that plugging in the value gives which is undefined. Thus, we are required to make a deeper analysis to determine the limit. Since the values of are less than , we consider values for such as and to make the following table of values:
The numerical evidence suggests that as approaches from the left, the values of are decreasing without bound. We conclude that
This result has geometric significance. It means that the line is a vertical asymptote for the graph of the equation
Now determine the limit (type infinity for and -infinity for ):
In the following example, we discuss limits as the input goes to . If then is increasing without bound, and we can use very large numbers for in our table.
Since , we will use powers of ten to generate large values of when constructing our table:
The numerical evidence suggests that as approaches , that is, as increases without bound, the values of are approaching the number . Hence,
This result has geometric significance. It means that the line is a horizontal asymptote (on the right end)for the graph of the equation
Now determine the limit: This limit tells us that the line is a vertical horizontal asymptote for the graph of the equation .
3 Limits and instantaneous velocity
Rectilinear motion is motion along a straight line. We will consider an object to be in motion along a number line to keep track of its location. We let the function denote the position of the object at time . Then the displacement of the object over a time interval, is given by . If we divide the displacement by the duration of the time interval, we get the average velocity of the object over that time interval:
Our goal is to determine the instantaneous velocity of the object at a given time. To do this, we will consider time intervals of shorter and shorter duration.
The average velocity of the object over the time interval is given by since feet. To obtain the instantaneous velocity, we will look for a pattern in the average velocity as the time interval gets shorter and shorter: It appears that as the average velocities are approaching the value ft/sec, as the time intervals get shorter and shorter (negative velocity just means the object is falling). Hence, we conclude that the instantaneous velocity at time seconds is ft/sec. Moreover, in terms of limits, the instantaneous velocity, , is a limit of average velocities: Technically, in this example we only considered the left-hand limit, . In the next problem, we will verify that the right-hand limit gives the same value.
Now determine the instantaneous velocity as a limit of the average velocities:
4 The Number
The number is fundamental to calculus due to the simplicity of the calculus formulas related to the exponential function and the natural logarithm function .
One origin story of this special number involves compound interest. Recall that the compound interest formula states that the amount of money resulting from investing a principle at an annual rate with the interest compounded times per year for years is given by the formula
A basic fact about compound interest is that the more frequently the interest is compounded, the faster the money will grow. To investigate this, we will focus on the variable and ask what happens as
Below is a table of values of corresponding to large values of :
What we can see from this table is that even with the number of compounding periods being as large as 1,000,000 per year, the principle of $1 will not even grow to $3 by the end of the year. So there appears to be a limit to the effect of increasing the number of compounding periods on the amount of money generated by compound interest at a rate of 100%. This limit is not a simple, easily recognized number and all we can say for sure from the table is that it appears to be somewhere around 2.718. In fact, the limit is irrational, like and . The famous 18th century mathematician Leonhard Euler (1707-1783) was the first to refer to it as , standing for “exponential”.
In conclusion, we can define as:
To fifteen decimal places Euler’s number is:
Now determine the limit (the answer is a well known number, denoted by a single letter):