We use a method called ‘‘linear approximation’’ to estimate the value of a (complicated) function at a given point.
The derivative is the slope of the tangent line.
Except in this section, the emphasis is on the line.
Note that is just the tangent line to at .
A linear approximation of is a ‘‘good’’ approximation as long as is ‘‘not too far’’ from . If one ‘‘zooms in’’ on sufficiently, then and the linear approximation are nearly indistinguishable. As a first example, we will see how linear approximations allow us to make approximate ‘‘difficult’’ computations.
With modern calculators and computing software it may not appear necessary to use linear approximations. In fact they are quite useful. In cases requiring an explicit numerical approximation, they allow us to get a quick rough estimate which can be used as a ‘‘reality check’’ on a more complex calculation. In some complex calculations involving functions, the linear approximation makes an otherwise intractable calculation possible, without serious loss of accuracy.
Differentials
The notion of a differential goes back to the origins of calculus, though our modern conceptualization of a differential is somewhat different than how they were initially understood.
Essentially, differentials allow us to solve the problems presented in the previous examples from a slightly different point of view. Recall, when is near but not equal zero, hence, Since is simply a variable, and is simply a variable, we can replace with to write
Adding to both sides we see While this is something of a ‘‘sleight of hand’’ with variables, there are contexts where the language of differentials is common. Here is the basic strategy:
We will repeat our previous example using differentials.
The upshot is that linear approximations and differentials are simply two slightly different ways of doing the exact same thing.
Error approximation
Differentials also help us estimate error in real life settings.
New and old friends
You might be wondering, given a plot ,
What’s the difference between and ? What about and ?
Regardless, it is now a pressing question. Here’s the deal: is the average rate of change of with respect to . On the other hand: is the instantaneous rate of change of with respect to . Essentially, and are the same type of thing, they are (usually small) changes in . However, and are very different things.
- is the change of associated to .
- is the change in needed to make the following relation true: