You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
Separable differential equations are those in which the dependent and independent
variables can be separated on opposite sides of the equation.
In this section we will see that the phrase
Divide and Conquer
is literally true (with the mathematical definition of “divide”) in the context of
differential equations. Rather than talk about math, let’s just show you what we’re
getting at.
Solve the differential equation where .
We’re going to divide an conquer, literally.
Divide both sides of by to find Now integrate both sides with respect to
and solve for to find Since we write
So . Our final answer is
Now that we’ve seen an example, let’s give discuss this in general.
A separable differential equation is a differential equation which can be written
in the form In other words, the independent variable and the function can be
placed on separate sides of the equals sign.
Calculus has lots of different notation. Each of these expressions means exactly the
same thing:
We will work with all the notation above.
Which of the following are separable differential equations? Select all that apply.
To be a separable differential equation, we must collect and on one side, and on
the other. Typically, you will do this with multiplication or division.
The reason we care about separable differential equations is that:
Separable differential equations help model many real-world contexts.
Separable differential equations are solvable by humans.
The basic ideas is if then we can integrate both sides, writing
If we can symbolically compute these integrals, then we can solve for . It is now time
to work some examples.
Proportional reasoning
In this example, we will show the power of knowing that one quantity is proportional
to another.
A snowball has a radius of inches. After hours, it has a radius of inch.
Assume
the radius changes at rate proportional to the snowball’s surface area, and
the surface area is proportional to the square of the snowball’s radius.
When is the radius of the snowball inches?
We’ll do this by setting up a differential
equation. Let be the radius of the snowball. From the statement of the problem we have
and hence Letting we now can write We now have a differential equation. Let’s
divide and conquer. Write with me integrating both sides with respect to we find
We know that , so let’s put that information to use
We also know that . Again write with me, noting that
Hence To find when the radius is inches, solve and we find is hours.
Some things to note about our last example:
It was solved without using the formula for the surface area of a sphere. For
us, it was sufficient to know that the surface area of a sphere is proportional
to the square of the radius.
Our solution, can be plotted in the slope field determined by :
Which of the following are equilibrium solutions to the differential equation ?
Exponential and logistic growth
In the science fiction television series Star Trek, a tribble is an alien species that is
furry, spherical (radius inches), that essentially does nothing but eat and reproduce.
_
Mr. Spock claims that there are tribbles aboard the space station K7, “assuming
one tribble, multiplying with an average litter of ten, producing a new generation
every twelve hours over a period of three days.” Explain Mr. Spock’s computation.
Perhaps Mr. Spock used an exponential differential equation to model this. Letting
be the population of tribbles at time (in hours), it makes sense that the rate that the
population is growing is proportional to the size of the population; this is the
definition of an exponential model. Write with me Ah, this is a separable differential
equation. Let’s solve it:
However we also know that . Write with me
After hours, we should have tribbles. So and we may write
Hence we can model the population growth with
Checking this with Mr. Spock’s computation, we see that
just as Mr. Spock stated.
If we graph the solution to the differential equation representing the population of
tribbles that we found above
we see that some time after hours, the growth rate of the tribbles explodes. In
reality this would be an ecological disaster. Exponential growth can be
scary.
Now we will see a model of population growth with environmental limitations.
Suppose that the birthrate of the tribbles is limited by how much food and space is
available. This gets us to the idea of carrying capacity.
The carrying capacity of a biological system is the maximum population that can
be sustained indefinitely with the given resources.
Let’s work an example involving this concept:
Suppose that the carrying capacity of tribbles aboard a space station is tribbles, we
start with tribble, and that growth rate (per tribble) is tribbles every twelve hours.
Model this population with a differential equation.
First, note that the population of
tribbles is proportional to the product and . This makes sense as when is small,
the growth rate should be small; and when is small, the growth rate should also be
small. Write with me Ah! This is a separable differential equation. Let’s solve it:
Use partial fraction decomposition to compute the antiderivative: However we also know that . Write
with me
After hours, we should have tribbles. So and we may write
Hence we can model the population growth with
Solving for we find If we graph this solution, we see a nice “S-curve”
In our last example we used the differential equation This is called the logistic
differential equation where and are constants. Let’s examine a slope field for this
model with some reasonable values of and :
Which of the following are equilibrium solutions to the differential equation above?
Predator-prey model
In nature there are animals that are predators and animals that are prey.
In the early 20th Century, Lotka and Volterra suggested the following
model to help us understand populations of predators and prey. Let
Lotka and Volterra made the following assumptions:
If there are no prey, then the predators starve at some rate proportional to
the number of predators. If there are prey, then the predator’s population
grows at a rate proportional to the product of the population of the
predators and the prey. In the language of calculus we write
If there are no predators, then the prey’s population grows at some rate
proportional to the number of prey. If there are predators, then the
prey’s population is reduced at a rate proportional to the product of the
population of the predators and the prey. In the language of calculus we
write
Taking these two equations, and dividing them we find
In the previous examples, it worked out that we could solve for as a function of . As
we will see with the predator-prey model, this is not always the case.
Find the solution to the differential equation that passes through the point .
To start, note that this is a separable differential equation. Write with me:
Remembering that the solution must pass through point , we write
Hence we have the following implicit equation relating and : Let’s look at this
solution along with the slope field:
From this graph, we can see the cyclic nature of the predator-prey relationship,
where the population of the predators is on the -axis, and the population of the prey
is on the -axis.