Suppose that slices are taken perpendicular to the -axis. Then, the slices are the slices are verticalthe slices are horizontal and we should integrate with respect to .
We can also use the procedure of “Slice, Approximate, Integrate” to set up integrals to compute volumes.
Accumulation of cross-sections
We have seen how to compute certain areas by using integration. The same technique used to find those areas can be applied to find volumes as well! In this section, we consider volumes whose cross-sections taken through their bases are common shapes from geometry. In fact, we can think of these cross-sections as being “slabs” that we layer either next to each other or over each other to obtain the solid in question. We begin with a motivating example.
We can apply the procedure of “Slice, Approximate, Integrate” to set up an integral that computes the volume of the solid.
Step 1: Slice Since the cross-sections are perpendicular to the -axis, this means that the slices are horizontal.vertical.
The slices on the actual three-dimensional solid are shown as well:
Recall that these slices on the base are the side of a square cross-section. The other side extends above the -plane. Thus, the actual slices on the solid look like:
Step 2: Approximate As usual, we approximate the base of each slice by a rectangle. For the sake of example, we use righthand endpoints and rectangles of uniform width to draw the picture:
The corresponding approximate slices on the solid are shown below:
The dark slab is a rectangular prism, so its volume is:
Since we are slicing with respect to , we must express the side length in terms of . Thus, we describe the curves in the image as functions of .
Note that the parabola must be described using functions of . In fact, solving for , we obtain and .
Note that the parabola does not pass the vertical line test, so it must be described using functions of . This also arises as an algebraic consequence when we solve for since we must consider the positive and negative square roots. In fact, solving for gives and .
We update our picture with what we have found so far.
From the image, we see that is a vertical distance.horizontal distance.
From our picture, we find and . Thus:
and using , we have that the approximate volume of a single slice at a given -value is:
Step 3: Integrate As before, the approximate volume is obtained by adding all of the volumes of all of the approximate slices together. The exact volume requires simultaneously that the width of the slices become arbitrarily thin and that the number of slices to be added becomes arbitrarily large.
As before, the definite integral performs both of these operations simultaneously. In fact, since , we can write:
and the total approximate volume using slices is:
where is the righthand endpoint of each slice.
Step 3: Integrate As before, the approximate volume is obtained by adding all of the volumes of all of the approximate slices together. The exact volume requires simultaneously that the width of the slices become arbitrarily small while the number of slices to be added becomes arbitrarily large. Symbolically, we write:
As before, we can write this as a definite integral:
Remark: Since we slice with respect to , we must express the curves in the image as functions of ; that is, we must write and in terms of . Once we choose a variable of integration, every quantity (limits of integration, functions in the integrand) must be written in terms of that variable. This is an important point that arises when we use a Riemann integral to compute any quantity of interest.
and the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus can now be used to evaluate the definite integral, which gives a much more efficient way to find the volume (rather than by calculating the simultaneous limits described above). Evaluating the definite integral, we find the volume is cubic units.
Volumes of solids with known cross-sections
We can summarize the previous procedure with a simple formula that respects the geometrical reasoning used to generate the volume of a solid with a known type of cross-section:
- If the cross sectional area can be expressed as a function of , then the volume is given by where is the -position of the leftmost cross-section and is the -location of the rightmost cross-section.
- If the cross sectional area can be expressed as a function of , then the volume is given by where is the -position of the leftmost cross-section and is the -location of the rightmost cross-section.
In each case, is the cross-sectional area of a slice of the solid. Note that both the area and the limits of integration must be expressed in terms of the variable of integration.
So how do we determine which formula to use? The problem will indicate an orientation for the slice. Draw the base of the solid in the -plane, and indicate a prototypical slice on your picture. The orientation of the slice will give you the variable of integration.
Let’s see some examples:
Since we have to integrate with respect to , we should describe the line as a function of . Solving for , we obtain .
We draw a picture of the base and indicate a typical slice.
Note that the cross-sections are semicircles whose base is in the -plane. Thus, the quantity labelled in the image is the radius of the semicirclediameter of the semicircle .
From the image, we see that is a vertical distancehorizontal distance .
The right curve is and the left curve is . Thus:
Notice that it is completely irrelevant of the quadrant in which the left and right curves appear; we can always find a horizontal quantity of interest (in this case ), by taking and using the expressions that describe the relevant curves in terms of .
After a little algebra, we find that the the radius of the semicircle is and the area of the semicircle is found using:
Thus, an integral that gives the volume of the solid is
Evaluating this integral (which you should verify by working it out on your own.), we find that the volume of the solid is cubic units.
Sometimes, more than one integral is needed to set up a volume of a solid with known cross-sections. Drawing a picture helps to identify when this is necessary.
Since the slices are taken perpendicular to the -axis. Then, the slices are the slices are verticalthe slices are horizontal and we should integrate with respect to .
Since we have to integrate with respect to , we should describe the line as a function of . Solving for , we obtain .
We draw a picture of the base and indicate a typical slice:
The left curve will change at the -value where the curve intersects the -axis, which occurs when .
For the second region, we find the upper -value by requiring that the curves and intersect. This occurs when .
Using the picture above and the fact that since the cross-sections are equilateral triangles, , we may write down the important information about each region.
Putting this together, we can write down a sum of integrals that gives the volume:
Final thoughts
To summarize some recurring ideas we have seen we have seen (and will see again), always draw and label a picture. Interpret the quantities in your picture and write down the relevant geometric quantities in terms of the variable of integration.
At the risk of being repetitive, let’s summarize some recurring ideas we have seen in the past few sections and will see again.
- Always draw and label a picture. Interpret the quantities in your picture and write down anything you need in terms of the variable of integration.
- To find vertical distances, we always take . To find horizontal distances, we always take .
- When we integrate with respect to , we use vertical slices and when we use vertical slices, we integrate with respect to . When we integrate with respect to , we use horizontal slices and when we use horizontal slices, we integrate with respect to .
Remember, it takes practice to learn math. Don’t just read through examples; work them out yourself as you read along. Calculus is a hard subject. Don’t get discouraged.
“The only way to learn mathematics is to do mathematics.” — Paul Halmos