You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
Power series interact nicely with other calculus concepts.
1 Reading derivatives from Taylor series
Recall that if \(f(x)\) has derivatives of all orders at \(x=c\), then the Taylor series centered at \(c\) for \(f\)
is
On the other hand, suppose we give you a series, that we claim is the Taylor series
for a function \(f\). Given just the series, you can quickly evaluate \(f(c)\), \(f'(c)\), \(f''(c)\), …, and so on. Let’s
see an example.
to the general form of a Taylor
(Maclaurin) series, we see \begin{align*} f'(0) &= \answer [given]{1}\\ f'''(0) &= \answer [given]{-2}\\ f^{(5)}(0) &= \answer [given]{4!}\\ f^{(7)}(0) &= \answer [given]{-6!} \end{align*}
2 Solving differential equations using power series
If we have a differential equation we can frequently use Taylor series to
obtain an approximate solution, which will be (hopefully) converge on some
interval.
In his study of optics, George Biddell Airy developed the so-called Airy function, a
function that solves the differential equation
\[ y'' = xy \]
for initial conditions \(y(0) = a_0\), and \(y'(0) = a_1\). As innocent
as this differential equation seems, it is impossible to find a closed form solution!
Nevertheless, Taylor series will rescue us.
Approximate a solution to the differential equation
\[ y'' = x\cdot y \]
where \(y(0) = 1\) and \(y'(0) = -1\), using the
first \(6\) nonzero terms of a Maclaurin series.
Differential equations give us a
recipe for computing derivatives. We’ll use this to produce a Maclaurin series
representing the solution of this differential equation. Start by writing down:
\begin{align*} y(0) &= \answer [given]{1}\\ y'(0) &= \answer [given]{-1} \end{align*}
To compute higher derivatives, simply differentiate the differential equation:
Just as we can differentiate term by term, we can also integrate term by term. This
allows us to approximate many functions where we cannot find a “closed-form”
formula. Recall the following theorem:
Derivatives and Indefinite Integrals of Power Series Let
\[ f(x) = \sum _{n=0}^\infty a_n(x-c)^n \]
be a function defined by a
power series, with radius of convergence \(R\).
\(f(x)\) is continuous and differentiable on \((c-R,c+R)\).
\(f'(x) = \sum _{n=1}^\infty a_n\cdot n\cdot (x-c)^{n-1}\), with radius of convergence \(R\).
\(\int f(x) dx = C+\sum _{n=0}^\infty a_n\frac {(x-c)^{n+1}}{n+1}\), with radius of convergence \(R\).
A few notes about the theorem above:
The theorem states that differentiation and integration do not change the
radius of convergence. It does not state anything about the interval of
convergence. They are not always the same.
Notice how the summation for \(f'(x)\) starts with \(n=1\). This is because the constant
term \(a_0\) of \(f(x)\) goes to \(0\).
Differentiation and integration are simply calculated term-by-term using
the power rule.
We’ll use this idea to investigate the function
\[ Si(x) = \int _0^x \frac {\sin (t)}{t} dt \]
an important function in signal
analysis.
Find a power series for \(Si(x)\) centered at zero and give the radius and interval of
convergence.
We can find a series expression for \(\sin (x)/x\) using division, write with me
which \(n\) is needed to approximate \(Si(2)\) with an accuracy of \(\frac {1}{10}\)?
By the alternating series
estimation test, we would need \begin{align*} \frac {2^{2(n+1)+1}}{(2(n+1)+1) \cdot (2(n+1)+1)!} < \frac {1}{10}\\ \frac { 2^{2n+3}}{(2n+3) \cdot (2n+3)!} &< \frac {1}{10} \end{align*}
We can experiment a bit to find that the least integer which makes this true is
\[ n= \answer [given]{1} \]
Thus \(Si(2) \approx 2-\frac {8}{3 \cdot 3!} = 1.\bar {5}\)
should be accurate to within \(\frac {1}{10}\). Wolfram alpha reports that \(Si(2) \approx 1.60541 \), we this appears to be
accurate!