Polar Axes
An ordered pair consisting of a radius and an angle \((r,\theta )\) can be plotted as
If we view this point on a circle of radius \(r\), then we can connect polar coordinates up to rectangular coordintes via our trigonometric functions.
Bridge between polar and rectangular coordinates: \begin{align*} x &= r\cdot \cos (\theta )\\ y &= r\cdot \sin (\theta ) \end{align*}
Polar coordinates are great for certain situations. However, there is a price to pay. Every point in the plane has more than one description in polar coordinates.
What about a negative radius? How should we interpret a negative radius?
\((-2,\pi )\) will mean to point in the \(\pi \) direction and then move backwards \(2\). It describes the same point as \((2, 2\pi )\).
To plot \(B\), go out \(1.5\) units along the horizontal axis and rotate \(\pi \) radians (\(180^\circ \)).
To plot \(C\), go out 2 units along the initial ray then rotate clockwisecounterclockwise \(\frac {\pi }{3}\) radians, as the angle given is negative.
To plot \(D\), move along the initial ray “\(-1\)” units, in other words, “back up” \(1\) unit, then rotate clockwisecounterclockwise by \(\frac {\pi }{4}\).
It is useful to recognize both the rectangular (Cartesian) coordinates of a point in the plane and the polar coordinates.
Given a point \(P=(r,\theta )\) in polar coordinates, rectangular coordinates are given by
Polar Graphs
Let’s talk about how to plot polar functions in the two coordinate systems.
We can plot points on rectangular axes thinking \(y = r(\theta )\).
\(\theta \) will be measured along the horzontal axis and \(r\) will be measured along the vertical axis.
Another graphing option is a polar coordinate system. Instead of measuring \(\theta \) horizontally, we measure it as a counterclockwise turn. Instead of measuring \(r\) vertically, we measure it away from the origin in the direction \(\theta \).
In the Cartesian graph, \(r\) begins at a height of \(2\) and then moves down as \(\theta \) moves to the right.
In the Polar graph, we turn counterclockwise to an angle of \(\theta \) and then move in that direction to a radial measurement of \(r\). So, we turn to \(0\) radians with a distance of \(2\). As \(\theta \) grows, we turn counterclockwise and the radial measurement shortens,
Then we continue turning counterclockwise and moving the radial measurement in and out until you get around the whole circle.
Converting to and from Polar Coordinates
It is sometimes desirable to refer to a graph via a polar equation, and other times by a rectangular equation. Therefore it is necessary to be able to convert between polar and rectangular coordinates. Here is the basic idea:
Given a function \(y=f(x)\) in rectangular coordinates, polar coordinates are given by setting
and solving for \(r\).
Given a function \(r(\theta )\) in polar coordinates, rectangular coordinates harder to find. The basic idea is to “find” \(r\cdot \cos (\theta )\) and \(r\cdot \sin (\theta )\) and write:
Sometimes it is useful to remember that:
We have found that \(r=\frac {\sin (\theta )}{\cos ^2(\theta )}\).
One connected piece of the domain of this polar function is \(\left ( \frac {-\pi }{2}, \frac {\pi }{2} \right )\). This will trace out the entire graph.
Since cosine is \(0\) at \(\frac {-\pi }{2}\) and \(\frac {-\pi }{2}\), and it is in the denominator of our expression for \(r\), we see that \(r\) is unbounded at the ends of our domain interval. This is how the ends of the parabola achieved.
When \(\theta \) is inside \(\left ( 0, \frac {\pi }{2} \right )\), then our direction is into the first quadrant. \(\sin (\theta ) > 0\) in the first quadrant, which means \(r > 0\). This means we are plotting points in the first quadrant, which is where the parabola is.
\(\theta = 0\) needs some thought. When \(\theta = 0\), then \(\sin (\theta ) = 0\) and \(r = 0\). That gives us the Cartesian point \((0,0)\), which is the bottom point on the parabola. But, if \(r =\) here, then how did we divide both sides of our equation above by \(r\)?
Just as algebraic thinking, there was a factor of \(r\) on both and we divided both sides by \(r\). This is simply symbolic manipulation according to the symbols and operations. When we thinking funationally or analytically, then we need to be thinking about possible values.
In this case, we might just talk about \(\theta = 0\) separately, by itself, and then let the algebra descibe the rest of the points. The \(r\) will never equal \(0\) and our division is ok.
Rather than dividing both sides by \(r\), we might bring everything to one side of the equation with \(0\) on the other side.
Factor,
Either \(r = 0\) or \((\sin (\theta ) - r \cos (\theta )) = 0\).
We could think about \(r=0\) and then we could think about \((\sin (\theta ) - r \cos (\theta )) = 0\) with \(r \ne 0\).
Function analysis requires us to keep track of all of the loose ends that algebraic symbolic manipulation just doesn;t care about.
This function is valid only when the product of \(\cos (\theta ) \sin (\theta )\) is positive. This occurs in the first and third quadrants, meaning the domain of this polar function is \((0,\tfrac {\pi }{2})\) with \((\pi ,\tfrac {3\pi }{2})\).
We can rewrite the original rectangular equation \(xy=1\) as \(y=\frac {1}{x}\). Note it only exists in the first and third quadrants.
The original polar equation, \(r=\frac {2}{(\sin (\theta )-\cos (\theta ))}\) does not easily reveal that its graph is simply a line. However, our conversion shows that it is.
We recognize this as a circle. By completing the square we can find its radius and center. \begin{align*} x^2-2x+y^2 &= 0 \\ \answer [given]{(x-1)^2 + y^2} &=1. \end{align*}
The circle is centered at \((1,0)\) and has radius \(1\).
ooooo-=-=-=-ooOoo-=-=-=-ooooo
more examples can be found by following this link
More Examples of Polar Graphs