Linear Transformations of Abstract Vector Spaces

Recall that a transformation is called a linear transformation if the following are true for all vectors and in , and scalars .

We generalize this definition as follows.

Linear Transformations and Bases

Suppose we want to define a linear transformation by Is this information sufficient to define ? To answer this question we will try to determine what does to an arbitrary vector of .

If is a vector in , then can be uniquely expressed as a linear combination of and By linearity of we have This shows that the image of every vector of under is completely determined by the action of on the standard unit vectors and .

Vectors and form a standard basis of . What if we want to use a different basis?

Let be our basis of choice for . (How would you verify that is a basis of ?) And suppose we want to define a linear transformation by Is this enough information to define ?

Because form a basis of , every element of can be written as a unique linear combination We can find as follows:

Again, we see how a linear transformation is completely determined by its action on a basis.

Theorem th:uniquerep assures us that given a basis, every vector has a unique representation as a linear combination of the basis vectors. Imagine what would happen if this were not the case. In the first part of this exploration, for instance, we might have been able to represent as and ( or ). This would have resulted in mapping to two different elements: and , implying that is not even a function.

Let be a basis of a vector space . To define a linear transformation , it is sufficient to state the image of each basis vector under . Once the images of the basis vectors are established, we can determine the images of all vectors of as follows:

Given any vector of , write as a linear combination of the elements of Then

Coordinate Vectors

Transformations that map vectors to their coordinate vectors will prove to be of great importance. In this section we will prove that such transformations are linear and give several examples.

If is a vector space, and is an ordered basis for then any vector of can be uniquely expressed as for some scalars . Vector in given by is said to be the coordinate vector for with respect to the ordered basis . (See Definition def:coordvector.)

It turns out that the transformation defined by is linear. Before we prove linearity of , consider the following examples.

Proof
First observe that Theorem th:uniquerep of Bases and Dimension of Abstract Vector Spaces guarantees that there is only one way to represent each element of as a linear combination of elements of . Thus each element of maps to exactly one element of , as long as the order in which elements of appear is taken into account. This proves that is a function, or a transformation. We will now prove that is linear.

Let be an element of . We will first show that . Suppose , then can be written as a unique linear combination: We have:

We leave it to the reader to verify that . (See Practice Problem prob:completeproofoflin.)

In our final example, we will consider in the context of a basis of the codomain, as well as a basis of the domain. This will later help us tackle the question of the matrix of associated with bases other than the standard basis of .

Practice Problems

Suppose is a linear transformation such that Find .

Answer:

Define by . (Recall that denotes the trace of , which is the sum of the main diagonal entries of .)
Find

Answer:

Is a linear transformation? If so, prove it. If not, give a counterexample.
Define by .
Find .

Answer:

Is a linear transformation? If so, prove it. If not, give a counterexample.
This problem requires the knowledge of how to compute a determinant. (For a quick reminder, see Definition def:threedetcrossprod of Cross Product and its Properties.) Define by .
Find

Answer:

Is a linear transformation? If so, prove it. If not, give a counterexample.
Define by . (In other words, maps a polynomial to its derivative.)
Find .

Answer:

Is a linear transformation? If so, prove it. If not, give a counterexample.
Recall that the set of all symmetric matrices is a subspace of . In Example ex:symmetricmatsubspace of Bases and Dimension of Abstract Vector Spaces we demonstrated that is a basis for . Define by . Find and .

Answer:

Let be a subspace of with a basis . Find the coordinate vector, , for .
If the order of the basis elements in Problem prob:coordvector was switched to form a new basis How would this affect the coordinate vector?

In Practice Problem prob:linindabstractvsp123 of Bases and Dimension of Abstract Vector Spaces you demonstrated that is a basis for . Define by . Find , and .

Answer:

Let and be vector spaces, and let and be ordered bases of and , respectively. Suppose is a linear transformation such that: If , express as a linear combination of vectors of . Find and
Complete the proof of Theorem th:coordvectmappinglinear.