You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
[?]
In this activity we will solve second and third degree equations.
Finding roots of quadratic polynomials is somewhat complex. We want to find such that
I know you already know
how to do this. However, pretend for a moment that you don’t. This would be a really hard problem. We have
evidence that it took humans around 1000 years to solve this problem in generality, with the first general solutions
appearing in Babylon and China around 2500 years ago. Let’s begin with an easier problem: make and try to solve
.
Geometrically, you could visualize as an square along with a rectangle. Make a blob for on the other side. Draw a
picture of this!
What is the total area of the shapes in your picture?
Now draw a new picture: take your rectangle and divide it into two rectangles.
What is the total area of the shapes in your picture?
Draw a next picture in your sequence: take both of your rectangles and snuggie them next to your
square on adjacent sides. You should now have what looks like an square with a corner cut out of it.
What is the total area of the shapes in your picture?
Finally, your big has a piece missing, a square, right? So if you add that piece in on both sides, the area of both
sides of your picture had better be . From your picture you will find that:
Can you find at this point?
Explain how to solve .
Cubic Equations
While the quadratic formula was discovered around 2500 years ago, cubic equations proved to be a tougher nut to
crack. A general solution to a cubic equation was not found until the 1500’s - and under some pretty strange
circumstances! See your text for the low-down on all of the drama.
We’ll show you the Ferro-Tartaglia method for finding at least one root of a cubic of the form
All I can tell you are these three steps:
(a)
Replace with .
(b)
Set so that all of the terms are eliminated except for , , and constant terms.
(c)
Clear denominators and use the quadratic formula.
How many solutions are we supposed to have in total?
Use the Ferro-Tartaglia method to solve .
How many solutions should our equation above have? Where/what are they? Hint: Make use of an old forgotten
foe…
Is the method described here the same as the one in our text as the proof of the “great theorem”? Explain why or
why not.
Use the Ferro-Tartaglia method to solve . What do you notice?
How do we do this procedure for other equations of the form Give an algebraic formula as your solution.
Would Ferro, Tartaglia, Cardano, or Ferrari have answered the previous question differently than you might?
2025-01-06 15:57:59
Start typing the name of a mathematical function to automatically insert it.
(For example, "sqrt" for root, "mat" for matrix, or "defi" for definite integral.)
Controls
Press...
...to do
left/right arrows
Move cursor
shift+left/right arrows
Select region
ctrl+a
Select all
ctrl+x/c/v
Cut/copy/paste
ctrl+z/y
Undo/redo
ctrl+left/right
Add entry to list or column to matrix
shift+ctrl+left/right
Add copy of current entry/column to to list/matrix
ctrl+up/down
Add row to matrix
shift+ctrl+up/down
Add copy of current row to matrix
ctrl+backspace
Delete current entry in list or column in matrix
ctrl+shift+backspace
Delete current row in matrix
×
Start typing the name of a mathematical function to automatically insert it.
(For example, "sqrt" for root, "mat" for matrix, or "defi" for definite integral.)