You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
Here is an opportunity for you to practice evaluating limits that involve
infinity.
You may need to input the symbol for infinity to answer one or more of the following
questions. To do so, type or or .
Your goal in this exercise is to evaluate (if it exists). First, consider the
corresponding one-sided limits:
As approaches from the left:
The numerator approaches , which is a positivenegative number.
is positivenegative and approaches
Therefore,
As approaches from the right:
The numerator approaches , which is a positivenegative number.
is positivenegative and approaches
Therefore,
Putting all of this information together, you can conclude that
From the above limit calculations, you can say that
doesdoes not have a horizontalvertical asymptote at .
Your goal in this exercise is to evaluate (if it exists). First, consider the
corresponding one-sided limits:
As approaches from the left:
The function approaches , which is a positivenegative number.
is positivenegative and approaches .
Therefore,
As approaches from the right:
The function approaches , which is a positivenegative number.
is positivenegative and approaches
Therefore,
Putting all of this information together, you can conclude that
From the above limit calculations, you can say that
doesdoes not have a horizontalvertical asymptote at .
Consider the function . The two -values at which may have a vertical asymptote
are
On this problem, it will help to factor the numerator and denominator of
.
Good thinking! For a rational function like , there could be an asymptote at all the
values where is undefined. The only way for to be undefined is if the
denominator of is 0. Since , the values that make the denominator 0 are , so
these are the potential values at which may have a vertical asymptote.
Now, determine if and are asymptotes of or not.
As approaches from the left:
The function approaches , which is a positivenegative number.
is positivenegative and approaches .
Therefore,
and based on this limit information, you can conclude that
is a vertical asymptote of . is not a vertical asymptote of . may or may not
be a vertical asymptete of . There isn’t enough information to decide yet.
Alright, now you know that is a vertical asymptote of . What about ?
Well,
and based on this limit information, you can conclude that
is a vertical asymptote of . is not a vertical asymptote of . may or may not
be a vertical asymptote of . There isn’t enough information to decide yet.
Because the limit information we have so far isn’t enough to make any conclusions,
evaluate the other one-sided limit:
Now, from all information you have obtained about the limit of at , you can
conclude that
is a vertical asymptote of . is not a vertical asymptote of . may or may
not be a vertical asymptote of . There isn’t enough information to decide
yet.
It turns out that while does not exist. This indicates that there is a hole at and
not a vertical asymptote! In fact, if you factor , you’ll realize that a factor of appears
precisely once in the numerator and denominator. Because of this, when you evaluate
, the ’s will cancel out, and you’ll find that the limit exists. This kind of ’cancellation
set-up’ is a tell-tale sign that the function at hand has a hole at rather than a
vertical asymptote.
Evaluate the limit.
To evaluate the above limit, you could multiply the numerator and denominator of
by (Type in the smallest exponent that would work)
Evaluate the limit.
To evaluate the above limit, you could multiply the numerator and denominator of
by (Type in the smallest exponent that would work)
Evaluate the limits.
To evaluate the above limits, you could multiply the numerator and denominator of
by (Type in the smallest exponent that would work)
Evaluate the limit.
Based on this limit, you can conclude that has a horizontal asymptote of
.
The function has a vertical asymptote of . This function also has two horizontal
asymptotes: One below the -axis, , and one above the -axis, .
Use the limit definition of vertical and horizontal asymptote in order to answer this
question. (Yes, that means you’ll have to calculate some limits!)
A function can have a maximum of horizontal asymptotes.
Could you explain to a fellow classmate why a function can have no more than 2
vertical asymptotes using the limit definition of a horizontal asymptote?
Consider the statement below, and then indicate whether it is sometimes, always, or
never true.
‘‘A function, , can have both a vertical and a horizontal asymptote of .”