You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
In this section we compute limits and define continuity.
On the real number line, , there are two directions for a variable to approach a value
: from the left, denoted , or from the right, denoted . As a result, we say that the
limit as exists for a function of one variable, , if For a function of two variables, the
situation is much more complicated. Consider a variable coordinate pair in
approaching a fixed coordinate pair . There are infinitely many paths the variable
pair can take.
For a function of two variables we say that the limit of as exists written if all
possible paths yield the same limiting value. We begin our examples with limits that
do not exist. To show that a limit does not exist, it suffices to demonstrate two
different paths which yield different limiting values. It should be noted that in the
next three examples, plugging in the terminal values of and will give the
indeterminate form.
Example 1 Show that the following limit does not exist: First consider a path
where (but ). Along this path, the function reduces to and so the limit is
zero. Now consider a path in which (but ). Along this path, the function simplifies to and
the limit as is infinite. Since the limits along the two paths were different, we must conclude that
(Problem 1) Show that the following limit does not exist:
Consider different
paths
Try letting and equal zero separately
Here is a video solution of problem 1:
_
Example 2 Show that the following limit does not exist: If we let then the
function reduces to just and so the limit will be . If we let , then since ,
we will again get that the limit is . Since these two paths yield the same
limit, we cannot yet conclude that the limit does not exist, and we must
try another path. If we allow the point to approach along the line , the
fraction becomes: To find this limit, we can apply L’Hopital’s rule since both
the numerator and the denominator are approaching zero: We have now
obtained two different paths that yield different limits and we can conclude that
(Problem 2) Show that the following limit does not exist:
Here is a video solution of problem 2:
_
Example 3 Show that the following limit does not exist: Along the axes, giving a
limit of zero. Along the line we obtain Along lines , we have All the paths so far
yield the same limit. Now, however, consider a parabolic path toward the origin in
which . Along this path the limit becomes Finally, we get a different limit and only
now we can conclude that
(Problem 3) Show that the following limit does not exist:
Here is a video solution of problem 3:
_
We now look at a limit that does exist, and we will use the squeeze theorem to
determine its value.
Example 4 Compute the following limit: We begin by using the fact that for any real
number , we have combined with the fact that if and , then to obtain We now use
the fact that together with the fact that if then to obtain Simplifying the left and
right members of the compound inequality, we have Clearly, and so by the squeeze
theorem, as well.
(Problem 4) Compute the following limit:
Use to create a compound inequality
Use the squeeze theorem
Here is a video solution of problem 4:
_
Example 5 Compute the following limit: We will use the squeeze theorem again. The
key inequality we need is To understand this inequality, consider which gives and
the key inequality follows since . As in the previous example, we now use combined
with the key inequality to obtain and
Hence, and as in example 4, the squeeze theorem implies
(Problem 5) Compute the following limit:
First show that
Use to create a compound inequality
Use the squeeze theorem
The preceding examples and problems require your intuition about limits. That is,
means that if the point is “near” the point , then the value of the function is “near”
. The next definition makes this precise.
Limit Let . We say that if there exists a number such that: Here, the notation
represents the distance in between the points and , i.e.,
The inequality in the definition of a limit reflects the fact that the point is never
equal to as it approaches the point .
Example 6 Use the definition of limit to show that Let . We must find a number
such that If we let we have Hence, we can conclude from the definition of limit that
(Problem 6a) Use the definition of limit to show that
(Problem 6c) Use the definition of limit to show that the limit of a constant is the
constant:
Let and choose any positive value for
1 Continuity
Continuity We say that the function is continuous at a point in the domain of if
Example 6, problem 6a and problem 6b show that the functions and are continuous
at every point in .
We can use the following limit laws to help us construct other continuous
functions.
1.1 Limit Laws
In each of the following limit laws, the point approaches the point . For ease of
readability, we abbreviate with .
Suppose that and exist, then we can conclude each of the following:
Sum Law
Constant Multiple Law
Product Law
Quotient Law
Note that the quotient law is valid provided that the limit in the denominator is not
zero.
Example 7 Use the limit laws to show that We have \begin{align*} \lim _{(x,y) \to (2,-1)} 5x^2y^3 &= 5\lim x^2y^3 \quad \text{(Constant Multiple Law)}\\ &= 5 \lim x^2 \cdot \lim y^3 \quad \text{(Product Law)}\\ &= 5 \left (\lim x\right )^2 \cdot \left (\lim y\right )^3 \quad \text{(Product Law (3 times))}\\ &= 5(2)^2(-1)^3 \quad \text{(Example 6 and Problem 6a)}\\ &= -20 \end{align*}
where we have used “” as an abbreviation for the given limit. Note that
this calculation shows that the function is continuous at the point since
.
(Problem 7) Use the limit laws to show that
Use the constant multiple law to
change the subtraction into addition
1.2 Continuous Functions
A polynomial in the variables and is a function of the form where and are
non-negative integers and the number of terms in the sum is finite. For example, the
function is a polynomial in and . The next proposition follows from the limit
laws.
Polynomials in and are continuous at every point in .
A rational function in the variables and is a ratio of polynomials in the variables
and . For example, the function is a rational function in the variables and . The
next proposition follows from the limit laws.
Rational functions in and are continuous at every point in where the denominator
is nonzero.
The next proposition involves a composition of a function of two variables with a
function of a single variable.
Suppose is continuous at the point and is continuous at the point . Then the
function is continuous at the point .
The functions and are continuous for all . Hence, the functions are continuous at
any point where the function is continuous. The function is continuous at any point
where is continuous and positive. Where is the function continuous?