You are about to erase your work on this activity. Are you sure you want to do this?
Updated Version Available
There is an updated version of this activity. If you update to the most recent version of this activity, then your current progress on this activity will be erased. Regardless, your record of completion will remain. How would you like to proceed?
Mathematical Expression Editor
Note that if we have a function of variables and a curve in its domain, we
can describe the position of each point on the curve in terms of a single
parameter . The outputs above this curve are given in terms of variables, each of
which can be described in terms of . This means that the values that the
function takes above the curve can be expressed in terms of only. Since this
is the case, we can ask many familiar questions from calculus of a single
variable, or interpret several old problems in this new setting. Here’s an
example.
Consider trying to find the maximum area of a rectangle that can be inscribed inside
of the ellipse .
The area of a rectangle centered at the origin whose upper right corner is in the first
quadrant is
We can now see that this area is a function of two variables, and .
With no additional restrictions, we see that by requiring that lies in the first
quadrant, the domain of will be and the range will be . Hence, the function is a surface in the -space whose output is the area of such a
rectangle to each point in its domain.
However, we now introduce that must also lie on the ellipse , which is a curve in the
domain of the function. We thus must examine the outputs of along this
curve.
When you encountered an example like this before discussing parameterizations, you
likely solved for one of the variables in terms of the other. There is nothing wrong
about doing this, but it leads to messy differentiation and algebra. When dealing
with circles and ellipses, it is often convenient to use knowledge of polar
coordinates (and trigonometric identities) to give a nicer description. Here, we
set
so we can make use of the identity .
Indeed, by substituting these results for and into the left-hand side, we
find:
We can now express the area evaluated along the ellipse as a function of a single
variable, :
Since and are nonnegative, we have . We can perform the usual analysis (find the
critical points, evaluate the function at the relevant ones in , check the end points,
then select the maximum), or we can use the trigonometric identity and
write:
Since is maximized when its input , we find the maximum occurs when . Since the
actual maximum of is , we find that the maximum area is , which occurs when and
.
The above example is an example of constrained optimization—when we are looking
for a minimum or maximum value of a function subject to certain conditions. This is
a fundamentally important idea and arises in many real world applications where
companies only have so many raw materials, employees, etc. After we develop more
tools later in this chapter, we will revisit problems like this one — as well as more
general ones — and use these tools to introduce a new method of solving these called
Lagrange Multipliers.