Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .
- Geometrically, gives the signed magnitude of the component of that is
parallel to ; when the angle between and is acute, is positive, and , and
when the angle is obtuse, is negative and
(think in terms of what this represents; don’t get lost in the notation!).
Since but , this means no part of is parallel to .
- Algebraically, if we have
Hence and and are orthogonalparallelneither orthogonal nor parallel , not orthogonalparallelorthogonal nor parallel .
Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .
- Geometrically, gives the vector component of that is parallel to . Since and are parallel by assumption, . Similarly, , so only if whenever and are parallelwhenever and are orthogonalcannot happen .
- Algebraically, we can write out the expressions for both orthogonal
projections.
Since is a vector in a direction parallel to and is a vector in a direction parallel to , the only way and could be equal is when and are parallel.
In this case, note that there is a nonzero constant so , and thus
Thus, only if whenever and are parallelwhenever and are orthogonalcannot happen .
Take a step back and look at both the algebraic and geometric reasoning used here. Both use the same observation, but it is very easy to lose sight of the geometric intuition in the context of the algebraic argument.
Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .
- Geometrically, gives the signed magnitude of the component of that is parallel to , so we expect .
- Algebraically, we can write out .
Once again, note that both the algebraic and geometric reasoning lead to the same result, but it’s easy to lose sight of the geometry in the algebra unless you force yourself to consider both perspectives.