Suppose that and are nonzero three dimensional vectors and let denote the vector dot product and denote scalar multiplication. Select all of the following that must be true. Try to think about each statement both algebraically and geometrically.
If , then and must be parallel. . If and are parallel, then . If , then and are parallel. is defined. .
Let’s analyze the statements one at a time.
True or False? If , then and must be parallel.

Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .

  • Geometrically, gives the signed magnitude of the component of that is parallel to ; when the angle between and is acute, is positive, and , and when the angle is obtuse, is negative and

    (think in terms of what this represents; don’t get lost in the notation!).

    Since but , this means no part of is parallel to .

  • Algebraically, if we have

    Hence and and are orthogonalparallelneither orthogonal nor parallel , not orthogonalparallelorthogonal nor parallel .

True or False?

Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .

Geometrically, this is difficult to think about, but note that , where is the angle between and . Since ,

True or False? If and are parallel, then .

Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .

  • Geometrically, gives the vector component of that is parallel to . Since and are parallel by assumption, . Similarly, , so only if whenever and are parallelwhenever and are orthogonalcannot happen .
  • Algebraically, we can write out the expressions for both orthogonal projections.

    Since is a vector in a direction parallel to and is a vector in a direction parallel to , the only way and could be equal is when and are parallel.

    In this case, note that there is a nonzero constant so , and thus

    Thus, only if whenever and are parallelwhenever and are orthogonalcannot happen .

Take a step back and look at both the algebraic and geometric reasoning used here. Both use the same observation, but it is very easy to lose sight of the geometric intuition in the context of the algebraic argument.

True or False? If , then and are parallel.

Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .

If and are orthogonal, then and .

What is true:

If and are not orthogonal and , then and are parallel.

The logic that can be used to show this can be extracted from the description given in the previous part of the problem.

True or False? is defined.

Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .

Note that is a vectora scalarundefined and is a a vectora scalarundefined so is definedundefined .
True or False? .

Would you like to see an explanation? YesNo .

  • Geometrically, gives the signed magnitude of the component of that is parallel to , so we expect .
  • Algebraically, we can write out .

Once again, note that both the algebraic and geometric reasoning lead to the same result, but it’s easy to lose sight of the geometry in the algebra unless you force yourself to consider both perspectives.