If and , then . If is continuous at , then exists. If exists, then
is continuous at . If is not continuous at , then does not exist. If
approaches the same value along every straight line path through , then must
exist.
Here are some explanations.
- For the first choice, note that the given information tells you the values
that the function approaches along the lines and is the same. This is not
enough to conclude that the limit exists. As a counterexample, consider
the function below.
- For the second option, the definition of continuity requires not only that exists, but that is defined and that
- To be continuous at , we need that exists AND .
- The issue for continuity may not be the nonexistence of the limit; it may
be because both and exist, but do not line up. For instance, consider the
function below.
- We need the function to approach the same value along every path through
, not just all straight line paths. A counterexample is the function in the
text, or the function below, which approaches along all straight line paths
through , but approaches as along .