Equal or not?

$\newenvironment {prompt}{}{} \newcommand {\ungraded }[0]{} \newcommand {\todo }[0]{} \newcommand {\mooculus }[0]{\textsf {\textbf {MOOC}\textnormal {\textsf {ULUS}}}} \newcommand {\npnoround }[0]{\nprounddigits {-1}} \newcommand {\npnoroundexp }[0]{\nproundexpdigits {-1}} \newcommand {\npunitcommand }[1]{\ensuremath {\mathrm {#1}}} \newcommand {\tkzTabSlope }[1]{\foreach \x /\y /\z in {#1}{\node [left = 3pt] at (Z\x 1) {\scriptsize $\y $}; \node [right = 3pt] at (Z\x 1) {\scriptsize $\z $}; }} \newcommand {\RR }[0]{\mathbb R} \newcommand {\R }[0]{\mathbb R} \newcommand {\N }[0]{\mathbb N} \newcommand {\Z }[0]{\mathbb Z} \newcommand {\sagemath }[0]{\textsf {SageMath}} \newcommand {\d }[0]{\mathop {}\!d} \newcommand {\l }[0]{\ell } \newcommand {\ddx }[0]{\frac {d}{\d x}} \newcommand {\ddt }[0]{\frac {d}{\d t}} \newcommand {\zeroOverZero }[0]{\ensuremath {\boldsymbol {\tfrac {0}{0}}}} \newcommand {\inftyOverInfty }[0]{\ensuremath {\boldsymbol {\tfrac {\infty }{\infty }}}} \newcommand {\zeroOverInfty }[0]{\ensuremath {\boldsymbol {\tfrac {0}{\infty }}}} \newcommand {\zeroTimesInfty }[0]{\ensuremath {\small \boldsymbol {0\cdot \infty }}} \newcommand {\inftyMinusInfty }[0]{\ensuremath {\small \boldsymbol {\infty -\infty }}} \newcommand {\oneToInfty }[0]{\ensuremath {\boldsymbol {1^\infty }}} \newcommand {\zeroToZero }[0]{\ensuremath {\boldsymbol {0^0}}} \newcommand {\inftyToZero }[0]{\ensuremath {\boldsymbol {\infty ^0}}} \newcommand {\numOverZero }[0]{\ensuremath {\boldsymbol {\tfrac {\#}{0}}}} \newcommand {\dfn }[0]{\textbf } \newcommand {\unit }[0]{\mathop {}\!\mathrm } \newcommand {\eval }[1]{\bigg [ #1 \bigg ]} \newcommand {\seq }[1]{\left ( #1 \right )} \newcommand {\epsilon }[0]{\varepsilon } \newcommand {\phi }[0]{\varphi } \newcommand {\iff }[0]{\Leftrightarrow } \DeclareMathOperator {\arccot }{arccot} \DeclareMathOperator {\arcsec }{arcsec} \DeclareMathOperator {\arccsc }{arccsc} \DeclareMathOperator {\si }{Si} \DeclareMathOperator {\proj }{\vec {proj}} \DeclareMathOperator {\scal }{scal} \DeclareMathOperator {\sign }{sign} \newcommand {\arrowvec }[0]{\overrightarrow } \newcommand {\vec }[0]{\mathbf } \newcommand {\veci }[0]{{\boldsymbol {\hat {\imath }}}} \newcommand {\vecj }[0]{{\boldsymbol {\hat {\jmath }}}} \newcommand {\veck }[0]{{\boldsymbol {\hat {k}}}} \newcommand {\vecl }[0]{\boldsymbol {\l }} \newcommand {\uvec }[1]{\mathbf {\hat {#1}}} \newcommand {\utan }[0]{\mathbf {\hat {t}}} \newcommand {\unormal }[0]{\mathbf {\hat {n}}} \newcommand {\ubinormal }[0]{\mathbf {\hat {b}}} \newcommand {\dotp }[0]{\bullet } \newcommand {\cross }[0]{\boldsymbol \times } \newcommand {\grad }[0]{\boldsymbol \nabla } \newcommand {\divergence }[0]{\grad \dotp } \newcommand {\curl }[0]{\grad \cross } \newcommand {\lto }[0]{\mathop {\longrightarrow \,}\limits } \newcommand {\bar }[0]{\overline } \newcommand {\surfaceColor }[0]{violet} \newcommand {\surfaceColorTwo }[0]{redyellow} \newcommand {\sliceColor }[0]{greenyellow} \newcommand {\vector }[1]{\left \langle #1\right \rangle } \newcommand {\sectionOutcomes }[0]{} \newcommand {\HyperFirstAtBeginDocument }[0]{\AtBeginDocument } \newcommand {\descriptionlabel }[1]{\hspace {\labelsep }\textbf {#1:}}$

Here we see a dialogue where students discuss combining limits with arithmetic.

Check out this dialogue between two calculus students (based on a true story):

Devyn: Riley, I’ve been thinking about limits.
Riley: So awesome!
Devyn: Think about $\lim _{x\to a} \left (f(x) + g(x)\right ).$ This is the number that $f(x) + g(x)$ gets nearer and nearer to, as $x$ gets nearer and nearer to $a$ .
Riley: You know it!
Devyn: So I think it is the same as $\lim _{x\to a} f(x) + \lim _{x\to a}g(x).$
Riley: Yeah, that does make sense, since when you add two numbers, say $(\text {a number near $6$}) + (\text {a number near $7$})$ you get $(\text {a number near $13$})$
Riley: Right! And I think the same reasoning will work for multiplication! So we should be able to say $\lim _{x\to a}\left (f(x) \cdot g(x)\right ) = \left (\lim _{x\to a} f(x) \right )\cdot \left (\lim _{x\to a} g(x)\right ).$
Devyn: Yes, I think that’s right! But what about division? Can we use similar reasoning to conclude $\lim _{x\to a} \frac {f(x)}{g(x)} = \frac {\lim _{x\to a} f(x)}{\lim _{x\to a} g(x)}.$

Give an argument (similar to the one above) supporting the idea that $\lim _{x\to a}\left (f(x) \cdot g(x)\right ) = \left (\lim _{x\to a} f(x) \right )\cdot \left (\lim _{x\to a} g(x)\right ).$

For the next problems, we use $\text {large}$ to represent large positive numbers, and $\text {small}$ to represent small positive values near $0$ .

Using the context above, $\frac {\text {large}}{\text {small}} = ?$

“large” “small” impossible to say

Using the context above, $\frac {\text {small}}{\text {small}} = ?$

“large” “small” impossible to say