We derive the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
Recall the definition of partial derivative from multi-variable calculus. Let be defined in a neighborhood of , then its partial derivatives are defined by
and
In the definition of we can let approach along any path. If we choose to be real, then we get a powerful result.
- Proof
- We let approach along the -axis in the definition of : \begin{align*} f'(z_0) &= \lim _{h \to 0 \atop h \in \R } \frac{f(z_0 + h) -f(z_0)}{h} \\[10pt] &= \lim _{h \to 0} \frac{\left [u(x_0 +h, y_0) + iv(x_0 +h, y_0)\right ] - \left [u(x_0,y_0)+iv(x_0, y_0)\right ]}{h} \\[10pt] &= \lim _{h \to 0} \frac{u(x_0 +h, y_0)- u(x_0,y_0)}{h} +i\lim _{h \to 0}\frac{v(x_0 +h, y_0)-v(x_0, y_0)}{h} \\[10pt] &= u_x(x_0,y_0) + iv_x(x_0,y_0) \end{align*}
Assuming that is a differentiable function of , then since , we have and Thus, if it exists, for any . Hence, if is differentiable, its derivative would be
Here is a video solution to problem 1a:
In the theorem above, we computed by letting be real. Suppose we let be purely imaginary, instead. Let where , then \begin{align*} f'(z_0) &= \lim _{h \to 0 \atop h = ik} \frac{f(z_0 + h) -f(z_0)}{h} \\[10pt] &= \lim _{k \to 0 \atop k \in \R } \frac{\left [u(x_0 , y_0+k) + iv(x_0 , y_0+k)\right ] - \left [u(x_0,y_0)+iv(x_0, y_0)\right ]}{ik} \\[10pt] &= \lim _{k \to 0} \frac{u(x_0 , y_0+k)- u(x_0,y_0)}{ik} + i\lim _{k \to 0}\frac{v(x_0 , y_0+k)-v(x_0, y_0)}{ik} \\[10pt] &= -iu_y(x_0,y_0) + v_y(x_0,y_0)\\ &= v_y(x_0,y_0)-iu_y(x_0,y_0) \end{align*}
Thus we see that we could have written as
Now, we have two different forms for which depend on the direction in which approached . By assumption, was differentiable at , so these two forms must be equal. This gives rise to the Cauchy-Riemann equations.
- Proof
- Since is differentiable at , we can let be either purely real or purely imaginary in the definition of and the results must be equal. Therefore and The result follows by equating the real and imaginary parts.
Some functions, like and , are best described using polar coordinates. To determine their derivatives, we need to express in terms of and . To do this, we will take advantage of the polar coordinate transformations, and the multivariate version of the chain rule. Suppose is differentiable at . Then, by the multivariate chain rule, \begin{align*} \frac{\partial u}{\partial r} &= \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial x}{\partial r}+\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\frac{\partial y}{\partial r}\\ &= \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \cos \theta + \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} \sin \theta \end{align*}
In short,
Here is a video solution to problem 1b:
Similarly,
By the Cauchy-Riemann equations, and we have Now, we can observe the Cauchy-Riemann equations in polar form: Finally, we would like to formulate , in terms of and .
for and
Here is a video solution to problem 1c:
From the Cauchy-Riemann equation, , and the result of the previous problem, we can write \begin{align*} f'(z) &= u_x + iv_x\\ & = u_x - iu_y\\ &= \left [u_r \cos \theta + v_r \sin \theta \right ] - i\left [ u_r \sin \theta - v_r \cos \theta \right ]\\ &= \left [u_r \cos \theta -i u_r \sin \theta \right ] + i\left [ v_r \cos \theta - iv_r \sin \theta \right ]\\ &= u_r e^{-i\theta } + iv_r e^{-i\theta }\\ &= e^{-i\theta }(u_r +iv_r) \end{align*}
We have just proved the following theorem:
We can write where . Since where , we have Hence, according to the theorem, \begin{align*} f'(z_0) &= e^{-i\theta _0}[u_r(r_0,\theta _0)+iv_r(r_0,\theta _0)] \\ &= e^{-i\theta _0}\frac{1}{r_0}\\ &= \frac{1}{e^{i\theta _0}r_0}\\ &= \frac{1}{z_0} \end{align*}
Dropping the subscript, we can write for in the slit plane.
Here is a video solution to problem 2:
The Cauchy-Riemann equations tell us that if is a differentiable function of , then it must satisfy . There is also a partial converse to this statement.
- Proof
- For ease of readability, we will drop the subscripts on the point .
Let and both be real numbers and consider the following limit: In a standard partial derivative, one of or would be zero. Our goal is to turn this limit into partial derivatives, and will do so with the aid of the Mean Value Theorem. Recall that the MVT states that if is a differentiable function (of a single variable), then for some number between and To apply the theorem, we we will add and subtract the term in the numerator of the above limit. This leads to The limits and will be dealt with similarly, so let’s focus on and apply the MVT, considering to be a function of a single variable (since the second component is constant). We have where is between and . In order to take advantage of the continuity of at the point , we add and subtract in the numerator and split into two limits: In the limit , note that , henceNow, the continuity of at gives which implies that Finally, the Squeeze Theorem gives and so Performing a similar analysis on yields Moreover, since , we can treat in the exact same way to obtain: where and Now we use the hypotheses that and satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations to rewrite and as and We can now readily obtain the result. \begin{align*} f'(z) &= \lim _{h+ik \to 0}{f(z+h+ik)-f(z)}{h+ik}\\[8pt] &=\lim _{h+ik \to 0} \frac{\left [u(x+h, y+k) +iv(x+h, y+k)\right ] - \left [u(x,y) + iv(x,y)\right ]}{h+ik} \\[8pt] &=\lim _{h+ik \to 0} \frac{u(x+h, y+k) - u(x,y)}{h+ik} + i\lim _{h+ik \to 0} \frac{v(x+h, y+k) - v(x,y)}{h+ik} \\[8pt] &= L_1+L2+ i(L_3 + L_4)\\[8pt] &= ( L_1+ iL_4) +(L2+ iL_3 )\\[8pt] &= \lim _{h+ik \to 0}\frac{u_x(x,y)(h+ik)}{h+ik} + i\lim _{h+ik \to 0}\frac{v_x(x,y)(h+ik)}{h+ik}\\[8pt] &= u_x(x,y) + iv_x(x,y) \end{align*}
Hence is differentiable at .
The real and imaginary parts of are Their partial derivatives are The partials are continuous on but the Cauchy-Riemann equations are only satisfied at since and
Here is a video solution to problem 3, part iii: