Accessibility statement: A WCAG2.1AA compliant version of these notes will eventually be available, once I finish writing them. You can also download the TeX source file.
1 About this webpage
These lecture notes were created with Ximera, an interactive textbook platform hosted by Ohio State University. The Ximera Project is funded 2024-2026 (with no other external funding) by a $2,125,000 Open Textbooks Pilot Program grant from the federal Department of Education.
These notes have not yet been peer–reviewed. To load the most updated version, click the orange “update” button at the top of the page. If it is not there, then you are reading the most up-to-date version. The button looks like this:
Funding was provided by The London Mathematical Society and Lancaster University, University of Bristol, University of Edinburgh, Warwick University, Queen Mary University of London, and Ximera.
2 Group Algebras and Coxeter Groups
For a finite group \(G\) and a field \(k\), the group algebra \( k[G] \) is the algebra over \(k\) with dimension \( \vert G\vert \) and a basis indexed by the elements of \(G\). The multiplication in \( k[G] \) is given by the multiplication in \(G\). As an example, the group algebra \( \mathbb {C}[S_n]\) has dimension \(n!\) with basis denoted by permutations \(\sigma \in S_n\). The multiplication of two basis vectors equals another basis vector, induced from the multiplication in the symmetric group \(S_n\).
The symmetric group \(S_n\) is an example of a Coxeter group. We can present \(S_n\) with generators \(s_1,\ldots ,s_{n-1}\) where each \(s_i\) is the permutation \( (i i+1)\). Then the relations are \[ s_i^2=1, \quad (s_is_{i+1})^3=1, \quad (s_is_j)^2=1 \text { if } \vert i-j\vert \neq 1. \] The condition \( (s_is_j)^2=1 \) is equivalent to \( s_is_j = s_j^{-1}s_i^{-1} = s_js_i\), which means that \(s_i\) and \(s_j\) commute.
A Coxeter group is a group \(W\) generated by a finite set \(S = \{s_1, \ldots , s_n\}\) of involutions, subject only to relations of the form \((s_i s_j)^{m_{ij}} = 1\), where \(m_{ii} = 1\) for all \(i\), \(m_{ij} = m_{ji} \geq 2\) for \(i \neq j\), and \(m_{ij} \in \mathbb {N} \cup \{\infty \}\) (with the convention that no relation is imposed when \(m_{ij} = \infty \)). The integers \(m_{ij}\) can be collected in a Coxeter matrix \(M = (m_{ij})_{1 \leq i, j \leq n}\). For example, the symmetric group \(S_{n+1}\) has Coxeter matrix \[ \begin{cases} m_{ii}=1 \\ m_{i,i+1} =2 \\ m_{ij} = 3, \vert i-j \vert >1. \end{cases} \]
Of course, there are strict restrictions on which matrices can be Coxeter matrices. The classification of Coxeter matrices can be found in [Cox35], and most probabilists could use this classification as a black box.
3 Hecke Algebras
The Hecke algebra is a q–deformation of (the group algebra) of a Coxeter group, analogously to the quantum group being a q–deformation of (the universal enveloping algebra) of a Lie algebra. First, note that if \( m_{ij}=3\) then \[ s_is_js_is_js_is_j=1 \] can be rewritten as \[ s_is_js_i = s_js_is_j \] since \(s_i^2=1\) for all i. By rewriting this way, the equation can be justifiably called a braid relation.
More precisely, given a Coxeter group \(W\) with generating set \(S\), the Hecke algebra \(H_q(W)\) (or \(H(W,q)\)) is a \(q\)-deformation of the group algebra \(\mathbb {C}[W]\). It is generated by elements \(\{T_i : 1 \leq i \leq n\}\) satisfying:
- The braid relations: \((T_i T_j T_i \cdots ) = (T_j T_i T_j \cdots )\) with \(m_{ij}\) factors on each side, corresponding to the Coxeter relations, and
- The quadratic relation: \((T_i - q)(T_i + 1) = 0\) for each i.
When \(q = 1\), the quadratic relation becomes \(T_i^2 = 1\), and the Hecke algebra specializes to the group algebra \(\mathbb {C}[W]\).
As an example of a Hecke algebra, we have that \(H_q(S_{n+1})\) is generated by \(T_1,\ldots ,T_n\) with relations \[ (T_i - q)(T_i + 1) = 0, \quad T_i T_{i+1} T_i = T_{i+1} T_i T_{i+1}. \]
For the type B Hecke algebra, which deforms the hyperoctohedral group, there is in fact a two–parameter deformation. This algebra is generated by \(T_0, T_1, \ldots , T_{n-1}\) subject to the relations \begin{align*} T_i T_{i+1} T_i &= T_{i+1} T_i T_{i+1}, \quad 1 \leq i < n-1 \\ T_i T_j &= T_j T_i, \quad |i - j| \geq 2, \\ T_0 T_1 T_0 T_1 &= T_1 T_0 T_1 T_0, \\ (T_i - q^{-1})(T_i + q) &= 0, \quad 1 \leq i < n-1 \\ (T_0 - Q^{-1})(T_0 + Q) &= 0. \end{align*}
The relation \(T_0T_1T_0T_1 = T_1T_0T_1T_0\) is related to the reflection equation ([Che84, Skl88]). Type B algebras in the context of reflecting boundary conditions have occurred in [?, Kua22]. Alexey Bufetov also has several recent papers on Hecke algebras in probability, such as [Buf20, BC24, BC24b, BB24, BN22]
4 \(R\)–matrices and representations
For any vector space \(V\), there is a natural representation of the symmetric group \(S_n\) on the n–fold tensor product \(V^{\otimes n}\) given by \[ \sigma \cdot (v_1 \otimes \cdots \otimes v_n) = v_{\sigma (1)} \otimes \cdots \otimes \cdots v_{\sigma (n)}. \] In the case of the Hecke algebra \(H_q(S_n)\), we need a R–matrix \( R: V\otimes V \rightarrow V\otimes V\) satisfying
- The braid relations \(R_{12}R_{23}R_{12} = R_{23}R_{12}R_{23} \)
- The quadratic relation: \((R - q)(R + 1) = 0\) for each i.
In fact, such a \(R\) exists (see [Jim86, ?, FRT88]). Thus there exists a representation of the Hecke algebra \(H_q(S_n)\) on \(V^{\otimes n}\) given by having the algebra element \(T_i\) act as \(R_{i,i+1}\).
Given a solution to a braid relation, generalizing that to a solution to the Yang–Baxter equation is called (Yang)–Baxterization. Generally speaking, this is not an easy task and goes back to e.g. [?, ?, ZGB91, Li93].
5 Schur–Weyl Duality
Since the main “body” of this survey is on quantum groups, we should relate Hecke algebras to quantum groups. The classical Schur–Weyl duality is a duality between the action of the symmetric group \(S_n\) and the action of the general linear group \(GL(V)\) on the \(n\)–fold tensor product \(V^{\otimes n}\). The theorem then states
- The centralizer of \(S_n\) in \(\mathrm {End}(V^{\otimes n})\) is precisely the image of \(\mathrm {GL}(V)\).
- The centralizer of \(\mathrm {GL}(V)\) in \(\mathrm {End}(V^{\otimes n})\) is precisely the image of \(S_n\).
The quantum version of Schur–Weyl duality was discovered in [Jim86]:
References
[BWW18] Huanchen Bao, Weiqiang Wang, and Hideya Watanabe, ”Multiparameter quantum Schur duality of type B,” Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Vol. 146 (2018), no. 9, pp. 3203-3216
[Buf20] A. Bufetov, Interacting particle systems and random walks on Hecke algebras, arXiv:2003.02730 (2020).
[BC24] A. Bufetov and K. Chen, Mallows product measure, Electron. J. Probab. 29 (2024), 1–33, arXiv:2402.09892.
[BC24b] A. Bufetov and K. Chen, Local central limit theorem for Mallows measure, arXiv:2409.10415 (2024).
[BB24] A. Borodin and A. Bufetov, ASEP via Mallows coloring, arXiv:2408.16585 (2024).
[BN22] A. Bufetov and P. Nejjar, Cutoff profile for ASEP on a segment, Probab. Theory Related Fields 183 (2022), 229–253, arXiv:2012.14924.
[Che84] I. Cherednik, Factorizing particles on a half-line and root systems, Theoret. and Math. Phys. 61 (1984), 977–983.
[Cox35] H. S. M. Coxeter, The complete enumeration of finite groups of the form \(r_i^2 = (r_ir_j)^{k_{ij}} = 1\), J. London Math. Soc. 10 (1935), 21–25.
[CGX91] Y. Cheng, M.L. Ge and K. Xue, Yang–Baxterization of Braid Group Representations, Commun. Math. Phys. 136 (1991) 195.
[Dri87] V. G. Drinfeld, Quantum groups, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Vol. 1, 2 (Berkeley, Calif., 1986), 798–820, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1987.
[FRT88] L. D. Faddeev, N. Yu. Reshetikhin, and L. A. Takhtajan, Quantization of Lie groups and Lie algebras, Leningrad Math. J. 1 (1990), 193–225. (Originally in Algebra i Analiz 1 (1989), 178–206.)
[Jim86] M. Jimbo, A \(q\)-analogue of \(U(\mathfrak {gl}(N+1))\), Hecke algebra, and the Yang-Baxter equation, Lett. Math. Phys. 11 (1986), 247–252.
[1] V.F.R. Jones, “Baxterisation”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 4 (1990) 701, proceedings of “Yang– Baxter equations, conformal invariance and integrability in statistical mechanics and field theory”, Canberra, 1989.
[Kua22] J. Kuan, International Mathematics Research Notices, Volume 2022, Issue 13, July 2022, Pages 9633–9662.
[KSS93] P. P. Kulish, R. Sasaki and C. Schwiebert, Constant solutions of reflection equations and quantum groups, J. Math. Phys. 34 (1993), 286–304.
[KS98] P. P. Kulish and E. K. Sklyanin, Algebraic structures related to reflection equations, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 25 (1992), 5963–5975.
[Li93] You-Quan Li, Yang Baxterization, J. Math. Phys. 34 (1993) 757.
[Skl88] E. K. Sklyanin, Boundary conditions for integrable quantum systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 21 (1988), 2375–2389.
[ZGB91] R.B. Zhang, M.D. Gould and A.J. Bracken, From representations of the braid group to solutions of the Yang–Baxter equation, Nucl. Phys. B 354 (1991) 625.